Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
If I put the instructions online, anonymous people might use them to become a remote patient of the clinic, but not actually take the time to inform everyone of their progress, so we lose useful data.
I think ultimately its better to encourage such feedback on the protocol but not require it. Even silent patients testing this for themselves may actually be useful at least from the clinics point of view they can anonymise the data and publish.
still using...resveratrol
Sorry to sound like I’m 100, but what is discord?
Values of ≤20 are considered normal and >20 are found in CFS. So a healthy person may have 19 or 20 for a given toxin and a CFS person may have let's say 22 or 23 (if I remember well, Hipsmans values were slightly over 20 as well). How can that little change make such a huge difference (from healthy to cfs)?
The implications / Conclusions: summarizing the results of the study of the general characteristics of the intoxication syndrome in patients with nephrodisbacteriosis and CBIS, the following should be noted. In the prevailing majority of patients (in 664/818 or 81.17%) there has been detected severe toxemia, in 140/818 (17.11%) – toxemia of moderate severity and only in 14 (1.71%) - of mild severity.
Sadly, none of the 4000+ ME/CFS patients that Dr Markov has treated with autovaccines over the last decade or so posted any information online about their progress, either positive reports of success, or negative reports of failure. If they had, then Dr Markov's treatment might have been world famous by now.
what if this is because he has not actually cured anyone?
Did you find that your bacteria grew better or faster in the egg hatcher at 37°C, compared to room temperature? Or did you find that both temperatures produced good results?
I had to ask, too, on another thread.I'm glad you asked that. I didn't know either.
I've never seen anyone's eGFR over 200 as your lab indicates. Most patients are between 70 and 130, though most I've seen are under 100. 93 looks great. It can dip lower if one is detoxing, like down to 50, but it will bounce back up when the stressor is removed.Hello,
Here's my gfr, not as dramatic as yourself hip or bright - thing is I don't know if my kidneys were simply taxed because of all the green tea I was taking and that's why it went down to 70 and then back up to 90 since I reduced my egcg intake? Could literally be anything.
View attachment 46942
That second dot is August. Last dot is Jan 17th 2022. Jun 3rd was the day before my second az jab, but I felt terrific that day ironically and was likely taking 200mg egcg 2 or 3 times a day, along with the oat bran and ala, all things I don't take now or take in vastly reduced doses.
Even so thought I'd post in case people are interested. I had no idea what healthy was - glad 93 is considered very healthy.