Hip
Senior Member
- Messages
- 18,133
I am interested in any high quality scientific skepticism you can provide regarding Dr Markov's theory and treatment of ME/CFS, @jaybee00. I like a good skeptical analysis.
By high quality, I mean something that on a scientific level, by analysing the biological mechanisms involved, or the empirical data available, disproves the theory, or disproves the treatment. Good quality scientific skepticism, which opens up in-depth debate, is great. We are all looking for the truth here.
But so far, I have seen no high quality contributions on this thread. Some people have made terse skeptical remarks along the lines of "bullshit". But that really does not mean much, and does not lead to any scientific discussion.
Of course, even without applying any thought whatsoever, skeptics will be right 99% of the time. This is not necessarily because they are clever, it's just because nearly all medical theories are proven wrong in the long term. So anyone who just automatically says "nonsense!" to every new medical that appears is going to be right in 99% of cases.
This means that a skeptical stance, where one says "that will never work" to any new theory, guarantees being right 99% of the time, without having to make any effort, or put any thought into it.
By high quality, I mean something that on a scientific level, by analysing the biological mechanisms involved, or the empirical data available, disproves the theory, or disproves the treatment. Good quality scientific skepticism, which opens up in-depth debate, is great. We are all looking for the truth here.
But so far, I have seen no high quality contributions on this thread. Some people have made terse skeptical remarks along the lines of "bullshit". But that really does not mean much, and does not lead to any scientific discussion.
Of course, even without applying any thought whatsoever, skeptics will be right 99% of the time. This is not necessarily because they are clever, it's just because nearly all medical theories are proven wrong in the long term. So anyone who just automatically says "nonsense!" to every new medical that appears is going to be right in 99% of cases.
This means that a skeptical stance, where one says "that will never work" to any new theory, guarantees being right 99% of the time, without having to make any effort, or put any thought into it.
Last edited: