hi Civicko -@Garz Can I have an invite too please?
you will need to enable conversations invites in your profile
are you undergoing the Markov Treatment at the moment ?
hi Civicko -@Garz Can I have an invite too please?
What about now?hi Civicko -
you will need to enable conversations invites in your profile
are you undergoing the Markov Treatment at the moment ?
Update: I'm still doing treatment and my third vaccine cycle is currently being shipped to me.
I finished my last cycle mid March so it's been about 5 months off and though I could have restarted after ~3-4 months, Dr Markovs prescription did suggest a wait of 3-6 months before next cycle so not sure whether to record that as any time off or not. Probably to be consistent with last time will mark July as no treatment, because I would have restarted in July if not for long shipping times to get my dipslides there and get the vaccines back.
I'm not sure exactly when it happened but I have definitely been doing more than last year, although my brain does feel slightly more derealised right now because of overdoing it, I have been able to do a lot more daily cognitive activity than in previous years before my brain shuts down completely.
Actually it doesn't usually shut down the same any more with the same sort of brain fog, I just get "long" pem where I generally feel more derealised and less "conscious", instead of my brain becoming so fogged that I can't think. Which can still happen if I concentrate too much but less rapidly. Which makes it harder to pace because the punishment is not as obvious or rapid-onset.
But I think overall considering how much I have been doing I do have relatively more energy on average than last year. I don't know if this is relevant to the treatment or not.
I'm not sure it's a full or half level change but relatively it feels like something. Physically I'm still bedbound all day but do go out to the kitchen on a rollie stool and have been making my own fried eggs when my Mum is gone. I've also gone to the back door a couple times to put the cat out.
My absolute limits are still not much, like I was washing my earmuffs in the kitchen sink and it became painful pretty quick and my arms/wrist muscles literally fatigued to exhaustion before I could finish washing them.
But I don't know, I think there is some difference from before it's just maybe a 5% to a 7% so not a full half level I don't think.
And it is hard to tell because my energy levels fluctuate anyway.
Then again, there are other symptoms which have gotten worse, like myoclonic jerks which only showed up in the last ~year.
My sense of smell is still much improved.
1. Me: My question is, is the reason for continuing to take these bivalents because you suspect there is still a possibility that those bacteria (Strep and E. Coli) might still be present even though not detected?
1. Dr. Markov: You have understood everything correctly. The most part of diseases are caused by one pathogen. For example, measles, diphtheria, chickenpox, etc. In your case, Nephrodysbacteriosis in kidneys and the focus in the nasopharynx are polyetiological diseases caused by a team of bacteria. During culturing/isolation of bacteria, we “catch” the dominant strains that are currently “sitting in the front row of the parterre/stall”. But our experience has shown that behind them are just streptococci (in the nasopharynx) and E.coli (in the kidneys). Therefore, we confidently introduce them into the vaccine to speed up the treatment process. At subsequent stages of treatment, we use polyvalent vaccines that include the isolated strains as well as up to 15 different types of bacteria that we previously detected in similar cases. These are rhinodentavaccine, pneumovaccine and urovaccine. In your case, we have not yet reached this stage of treatment.
2. Me: I remember you wrote somewhere that combining deposited vaccines with autostrains is more effective — is that correct? But do some people recover using only autostrains? How major is the benefit of the deposited strains in addition?
2. Dr. Markov: About 25 years ago, we used only strains of bacteria isolated from a patient. But the process of recovery moved slowly, with long intervals. Therefore, within about last 10-12 years, we began to use a combination of own bacteria (autostrains of bacteria) with a large set of deposited/deponited strains. We established our own museum of deposited strains and placed about 100 strains of the most pathogenic bacteria in the National Depository of Microbial Strains of Ukraine as reference samples for industrial production of vaccines (if it comes to that). Since vaccines contain only a set of antigens from destroyed bacteria, the vaccine becomes much more immunogenic (and gives a better clinical result of use), while remaining completely non-virulent (non-infectious). There are no living bacteria in vaccines, only their fragments. Just this is the basis for our patents, which we had received in 2018, for 9 mono-, bivalent- and polyvalent vaccines. Just their consistent/consecutive use ensures the best clinical result.
3. Me: Is there a difference in Staph bacteria between Staphylo-Primavac and Staphylococcus-Streptococcus Bivalent, i.e. is the Staphylococcus component in the bivalent also a revaccination?
3. Dr. Markov: No, there is no difference in the set of deposited staphylococci in monovalent and bivalent (with streptococci) vaccine. Both each have 80 strains of the same staphylococci. Simply, in the bivalent vaccine we necessarily/surely introduce autostrains that are absent in the purely staphylococcal vaccine. The dosages, schemes and place of administration also differ.