Years ago I tried Freddd's protocol and was getting good results. I primarily stopped due to not having doctor access, among other things. Not that anything would go wrong, but I am cautious in nature.
I'm interested in starting again and am very curious about how one determines the balances of non-B vitamin supplements.
I've seen a lot of talk over
I know Rich was big into getting tests done (blood, stool, etc.) however not all doctor offices offer all of these tests. Even then, I have difficulty trusting the tests. I always show as healthy in B12 and Folate, but when I tried the protocol I had LARGE positive impact. I know Freddd has less faith in the "healthy" levels of tests as they could be skewed by years of bad assumptions and data on what optimal health is.
Are there tests that are easily ordered and have high accuracy? Or are we just in a stage where trial and error what needs to be done when testing isn't full proof?
I'm interested in starting again and am very curious about how one determines the balances of non-B vitamin supplements.
I've seen a lot of talk over
- Magnesium
- Zinc
- Copper
- Calcium
I know Rich was big into getting tests done (blood, stool, etc.) however not all doctor offices offer all of these tests. Even then, I have difficulty trusting the tests. I always show as healthy in B12 and Folate, but when I tried the protocol I had LARGE positive impact. I know Freddd has less faith in the "healthy" levels of tests as they could be skewed by years of bad assumptions and data on what optimal health is.
Are there tests that are easily ordered and have high accuracy? Or are we just in a stage where trial and error what needs to be done when testing isn't full proof?