• Phoenix Rising needs funds to operate: please consider donating to support PR

My letter to AfME 14 March 2011

(I am sure you can excuse the errors. I don't think I received any reply.)

Dear AfME,

I am just skim-read your article about the PACE study on page 4 of the Spring issue of InterAction, and hope that your scientists will be producing a detailed critique of the study.

A very quick look at the main study paper reveals a number of areas which merit question. For example, an overwhelming proportion of people initially approached to participate were excluded, and the expectations of those who did participate appear highly atypical, but concur closely with outcomes. The study sample may have been an overly self-selected sub-group. It is likely, for example, to have excluded people who have previously tried GET and experienced adverse effects, as in your own studies.

Unfortunately I cannot spare the time to analyse the study thoroughly myself without remuneration, being a sufferer myself who is struggling to make ends meet and suffers severe adverse effects from over-exertion.

Regards,

Comments

Blog entry information

Author
MeSci
Views
252
Comments
1
Last update

More entries in User Blogs

More entries from MeSci