It reminds me again why I find her so irritating. She does have a lot of interesting info on her blog and does read widely but her hypotheses and theories quickly get stated as established fact and it is difficult to tell where one starts and the other finishes.
Yes, I feel the same. She has much information about the most important strands of bacterias, and I have to learn to be able to interprete the stool tests.
Anyhow, as far as I am aware, there are only two PCR-based tests available which give some insight into the species level. One is the Genova test which has a very limited range (listed in full in my post above) and the metagenomics stool analysis (MSA) test from Red Labs in Belgium which I believe looks at up to 100 analytes. I haven't considered the latter test since I thought it unlikely that I could get my sample from the east coast of Australia to Belgium within the 3 day time period specified. Still it looks like an excellent test, albeit expensive.
I considered the MSA, but did it not. I have a friend with heavy gut dysbiosis and allergies, and the test he said, he has no one parasite or candida, according to this test he is healthy. But I can hardly imagine, that there could be guf dysbiosis without any parasite or fungi, I assume, they are not detected in stool, but they are present.
It did nothing for him.
But I consider doing the Genova test. I asked there, I have to indicate a practitioner, and then I can order by myself.
But as far as I read until now, Ubiome has all important strands, that Genova has?
Best wishes for you also, jepps