Cinders66
Senior Member
- Messages
- 494
I am very disappointed by the new draft guidelines. At last NICE recognises that GET/CBT are not cures for ME and that GET is not an appropriate treatment. Plus it acknowledges that there is a dire need for education of health professionals and the distrust that many pwME feel towards the medical community. Is that it?!
The recommendations are weak and I do not believe will do much to significantly improve the life outcomes for pwME. The draft talks about specialist services working with pwME to draw up personalised care plans and support them. However, there is a dire shortage of these services across the UK. Do the draft recognize this? NO Does it recommend a big investment into providing specialist care for pwME? NO
I live in West Yorkshire (pop approx 1.9 million) there is one NHS specialist centre to my knowledge based in Leeds. I've been to it twice and I got alot worse under its tender mercies.
The recommendations for future research are again weak. Take the issue of pain. I recently interviewed Professor Jan Nijs, who has spent the many years researching chronic pain and ME. His latest research points to a link between neuro-inflammation and diet as contributing factors in causing pain in pwME. Will NICE recommend research into these biological causes of pain in pwME? NO
I could write a book about bad this draft is. I agree with a press release recently put out by Invest in ME that this is tepid stuff that won't make much of a difference to the life outcomes for pwME.
Am going to carry on fighting against the dire lack of resources put into supporting pwME - hell yes.
it does seem odd if the guidelines doesn’t acknowledge the services problem. Who best to discuss it than the commitee giving service use recommendations?