Here is more information about a COVID-19 vaccine on the Virology blog, i.e. much better than my ramblings:Woah, maybe they'll force vaccines on us in the future...
http://www.virology.ws/2020/03/11/sars-cov-2-the-vaccine-landscape/
Here is more information about a COVID-19 vaccine on the Virology blog, i.e. much better than my ramblings:Woah, maybe they'll force vaccines on us in the future...
Here's what the virology blog writes about the origin of COVID-19I'd be very interested about your opinions about this doctor's claim:
I'd be interested in arguments that confirm or contradict his claim.
I therefore personally view the doctor's argument "They found a new virus, but actually didn't know if these patients really died from it" as disproved.The government in Wuhan, China confirmed on 31 December that dozens of cases of pneumonia of unknown cause were being treated in that city. Pneumonia can be caused by viruses (e.g. influenza virus) and bacteria (e.g. Streptococcus pneumonia). These patients had high fever, difficulty breathing, and lesions in their lungs. No deaths have been reported. SARS and MERS coronaviruses, avian influenza viruses, and adenovirus have been ruled out as causative agents of the disease.
A scientist leading the investigation of the new agent, Xu Jianguo, has announced that on 7 January 2020 a new coronavirus was identified. Apparently the virus was isolated from a patient and the entire genome sequence obtained. On ProMedMail he is quoted as saying “A total of 15 positive results of the new coronavirus were detected by nucleic acid detection methods” which I presume to be PCR. However it is not clear if this statement means that 15 patients have tested positive for this virus.
The damage to the lungs, and the ultimate respiratory failure, is fairly independent of the invasion of the brain stem, CNS, etc. The virus, being airborne, goes straight to the lungs that inhales the viral shedding, where it saws thru them with alarming speed, creating the signature 'ground glass' patterns on an Xray or MRI and the subsequent respiratory failure.Coronavirus Invades the brainstem, causing respiratory failure/central apnea
Totally agree. Sadly, no one in a position to make a difference will.I am totally not against vaccines, but I am against unreasonableness. To me, testing a vaccine directly on humans seems unreasonable having in mind that the probability is not so small that it won't help at all, i.e. risk and benefit don't seem to have a good ratio, and to me that doesn't justify the risk that is put on humans here.
It's soooooo not correct. But, as above, thoI just think it is made the impression that a vaccine will be the rescuer (and of course, it will sell tremendously), while I don't see why that could be correct.
Almost without a doubt. At least they'll try. I think that they, whoever 'they' are, should be forced to be the first to be vaccinated, and allow at least a year for side effects to present before it's forced on the general public.Woah, maybe they'll force vaccines on us in the future...
.... 'cause they have been so often in the past?Im hoping whoever is doing the vaccines and testing it will be transparent about everything they’re doing and figure out all possible long term side effects.
We have a similar saying over here: Rust never sleeps, steel don't heal, and stupid is forever ....In Japan we have a saying, there's no pill for stupid.
https://www.zeit.de/wissen/gesundheit/2020-03/corona-pandemie-virus-covid-19-ausbreitung-live-blogIn England, the number of deaths from coronavirus rose by almost 50 percent to 99 within one day. This is communicated by the English health authorities.
I think the reason why Italy exploded with the virus is due to their highly public and enthusiastic pursuit of life in general. The evening pasageata comes to mind, where entire towns turn out in the early evening cool to stroll around, exchanging hugs, gossip, and chats for hours on end.I agree about the consequences...but if you look to Italy...nobody really knows why this country is so severely affected...if you look to Italy, the economy would break down, too, I'd say.
I wouldn;t trust the 'official' Chinese numbers, which might be wildly underestimated for any number of reasons.If I look to China, the official numbers aren't so catastrophic as models said - or are they?
"Die Zeit" writes:
https://www.zeit.de/wissen/gesundheit/2020-03/corona-pandemie-virus-covid-19-ausbreitung-live-blog
One has to keep in mind that UK doesn't test... (Germany doesn't really test, too.)
There are several critical voices here in Germany about the "exaggerated" measures which are being taken and the disastrous consequences for the economy. Some look jealously to UK: The UK will have an economic advantage, UK companies might even buy German smaller companies etc.
I agree about the consequences...but if you look to Italy...nobody really knows why this country is so severely affected...if you look to Italy, the economy would break down, too, I'd say.
At this point we cannot say for sure what would be more disastrous...a shutdown or UK's plan...doing nothing. We will see.
After reading the virology blog, I don't agree this virus is "normal" or even harmless. They started out like "this is a harmless virus" and changed that narrative over the time. No catastrophizing and no "such a deadly virus".
Sure, the world could have chosen UK's path...the economy probably would suffer less - or maybe not. We can't say. So why do the other countries go another way?
Honestly, I remain confused about whether this virus is especially dangerous or not. If I look to China, the official numbers aren't so catastrophic as models said - or are they?
If I look to Italy it's really bad.
The numbers in Germany aren't sky rocket high either at this point of time.
So confused...
SOURCE80% of cases are mild
Based on all 72,314 cases of COVID-19 confirmed, suspected, and asymptomatic cases in China as of February 11, a paper by the Chinese CCDC released on February 17 and published in the Chinese Journal of Epidemiology has found that:
- 80.9% of infections are mild (with flu-like symptoms) and can recover at home.
- 13.8% are severe, developing severe diseases including pneumonia and shortness of breath.
- 4.7% as critical and can include: respiratory failure, septic shock, and multi-organ failure.
- in about 2% of reported cases the virus is fatal.
- Risk of death increases the older you are.
- Relatively few cases are seen among children.
Anybody heard why 80% of cases are mild and that children have mild, to very mild symptoms?
Doctor said that I won't be able to get tested until: 1) I have a fever, and 2) can show that I had direct contact with a confirmed case.
HENRICO COUNTY, Va. (WRIC) — A pop-up testing site was set up Wednesday at Dorey Park in Henrico County in order to test people who have mild symptoms of the novel coronavirus but don’t meet the requirements to be tested through the state lab. The facility, organized by the Virginia Department of Health and Central Incident Management Team, is meant for people who have already been in contact with the health department, not the general public.
Maybe the melatonin theory?
Yesterday was a discussion that the younger immune system is "more creative" and can respond better to new things...than our older immune system.
Anybody heard why 80% of cases are mild and that children have mild, to very mild symptoms?
Yes.