To answer a question about how much people take, I take one of the big 30gram scoops. I've had days where I've done that twice (without a notable effect).
When I made my first post I'd had no real crashes since starting the whey. Now i've crashed once. So I'm now less convinced it's any sort of miracle cure, but I think it still is doing some good. At the very least it is getting some calories from protein which hopefully crowds out some carbs. And it tastes pretty good!
Only trouble is I seem to have gone through an $A70 tub in about a month. I shall have to decide if that represents good value or not!
Also, FWIW, since people above are discussing Naviaux and amino tests you might be interestd in this. A while ago , I went and checked if Naviaux's paper showed amino acids being any lower in patients than controls, (like in the Fluge and Mella paper.)
You might remember the Fluge and Mella paper had two groups of aminos. Ones that fed in before the PDH problem (which were normal), and ones that fed in after (which were low).
The first four rows in this picture show the levels of some of the AAs Fluge and Mella found being normal, as measured by Naviaux. The following six rows show some of the ones F+M found being low. You can see columns for female patients and controls, then the same for males.
In summary, it doesn't seem to me to replicate their findings. (nb I am just an amateur at all this). Most AAs are about the same in patients as controls. That could be for technical reasons, I'm not sure (or because F+M's work doesn't replicate: eek!). But, intriguingly, it does seem to show higher levels of the early cycle AAs than the later ones, which is not totally inconsistent with Fluge and Mella.