have lots of disappointment with bolognese and his office. He's very smart but has major blind spots. Because of him I am left out in the cold and suffering for a long time without help . I am too tired to write up my whole experience and we cannot post videos here but if anyone must know my experience I can message it to you, for the full details.
All i can say is his screening methods are extremely flawed and he misses a lot of cases
Leaving severely ill people to suffer without help. I also have to wonder if it's even worth seeing him if you don't already see Kaufman or chheda, the high end internists/mecfs docs, who advocate very intensely for their patients AND have a working relationship withbolognese, so he respects them. I don't have a primary me/cfs doc that organizes treatments for me, mine is extremely scattered and spacy, and will not advocate for me. But I couldn't afford Kaufman, or thought I couldn't and didn't consider fundraising for it, earlier in my illness. I think if you looked at a study of patient outcomes for bolognese, it's more likely that kaufman patients get the surgeries they need without being overlooked by bolgonese , and that he helps with the advocacy and communication that are very very difficult for me/cfs patients that are severe.