Do your doctor and "friend" have magical powers which allow them to know a specific SNP is relevant when there is no research showing that it has any impact?My doctor told me this. My friend confirmed it.
Do your doctor and "friend" have magical powers which allow them to know a specific SNP is relevant when there is no research showing that it has any impact?My doctor told me this. My friend confirmed it.
Which type of blood pressure meds? I know that you were on an ACE inhibitor - did you continue taking this?A slight improvement in energy, but I was taking lots of other things as well. I did not notice an improvement in skin issues. However my skin issues improve when I stop taking blood pressure meds.
Safety should take priority over efficacy in the first instance unless one needs to treat something urgently. That's why we should start low when we try something (and I have tried a lot of things for various symptoms, like many/most of us). My own arguments for starting low are (apart from increased sensitivity to substances in ME):None of those people in those threads said they were taking it for seb derm. That is the crucial difference. I laid out the evidence fair enough, plus it fixed me. Plus the first woman had side effects from the potassium, not the biotin.
I am not saying you should start at 5000mcg, I am just saying you will not see changes till you get to at least that dose, that is what the doctor who invented the biotinidase test that is giving to infants told me personally.
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 136 (2003) 95–112
Hyperinsulinemic diseases of civilization: more than just Syndrome X <= full text available here
Loren Cordain*, Michael R. Eades, Mary D. Eades
Department of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Abstract
Compensatory hyperinsulinemia stemming from peripheral insulin resistance is a well-recognized metabolic disturbance that is at the root cause of diseases and maladies of Syndrome X (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, obesity, abnormal glucose tolerance). Abnormalities of fibrinolysis and hyperuricemia also appear to be members of the cluster of illnesses comprising Syndrome X. Insulin is a well-established growth-promoting hormone, and recent evidence indicates that hyperinsulinemia causes a shift in a number of endocrine pathways that may favor unregulated tissue growth leading to additional illnesses. Specifically, hyperinsulinemia elevates serum concentrations of free insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and androgens, while simultaneously reducing insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Since IGFBP-3 is a ligand for the nuclear retinoid X receptor a, insulin-mediated reductions in IGFBP-3 may also influence transcription of anti-proliferative genes normally activated by the body’s endogenous retinoids. These endocrine shifts alter cellular proliferation and growth in a variety of tissues, the clinical course of which may promote acne, early menarche, certain epithelial cell carcinomas, increased stature, myopia, cutaneous papillomas (skin tags), acanthosis nigricans, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and male vertex balding. Consequently, these illnesses and conditions may, in part, have hyperinsulinemia at their root cause and therefore should be classified among the diseases of Syndrome X.
Keywords: Acne; Early menarche; Epithelial cell carcinomas; Hyperinsulinemia; Increased stature; Myopia; Cutaneous papillomas (skin tags); Acanthosis nigricans; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Male vertex balding
Do you and 'DH' (husband?) have hyperinsulinaemia? I don't think I have. My blood glucose has always tested OK (both in healthcare settings and at home) apart from briefly during one acute illness.I found this review paper has the best explanation for unregulated epithelial cell proliferation (dermatitis included) matching to my personal observations (both for me and DH):
In the past 7 months we haven't had a single dermatitis outburst - ever since we starting eating 2 eggs daily (with well cooked whites and runny yolks for improved Biotin bioavailability). We do not eat a low carb diet since it didn't work for neither of us, but we eat gluten free, soy free, milk free and no highly processed foods. However, eating dairy always cause me to have dandruff (all dairy is rich in growth hormone). I can't leave dairy out due to both oxalate and uric acid complications.
We can't take a single B vitamin longer than 3-4 days otherwise we get funky side effect - probably causing a deficiency in another B vit and/or mineral. So I have been juggling with food the past months. What works for me doesn't work for DH and vice-versa. He needs starch in the breakfast, I need it at dinner. He likes his eggs fried in butter for dinner, I like mine boiled in the morning, and so on
Do your doctor and "friend" have magical powers which allow them to know a specific SNP is relevant when there is no research showing that it has any impact?
No, but an absence of evidence is an absence of evidence. You are making a scientific claim, but refusing to provide any evidence for it. It shouldn't be unexpected that such a claim is not afforded automatic respect.Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
there are a lot of people saying much less proven things on here yet you are focusing on me like a cat chasing a reflection on a wall.
No, but an absence of evidence is an absence of evidence. You are making a scientific claim, but refusing to provide any evidence for it. It shouldn't be unexpected that such a claim is not afforded automatic respect.
When someone brings science into a discussion, as you have done with SNPs, there is every expectation that the science will be rigorously examined. That is how science works.
I have an interest in genetics, and a respect for the field. Accordingly, it annoys me when someone makes false or unsubstantiated claims regarding SNPs.
If it's a hypothesis, why are you using it as a basis for recommending a treatment?I am not making scientific claims, I am hypothesizing.
If it's a hypothesis, why are you using it as a basis for recommending a treatment?
How many subjects do you need with or without seborrheic dermatitis to get a statistically significant result? Where is your study protocol posted? Who provided ethical approval for such a study? How are you diagnosing seborrheic dermatitis?I am not recommending it for treatment, I am sharing so if people want to try it we can TEST the hypothesis. That is how science works; make a hypothesis, then test it. When those tests are repeatable and consistent, we have a theory.
You're making a claim, not investigating something. You very clearly stated the SNP was relevant, based on someone else's claims.However he said that my heteozygous SNP in HLCS rs3787752 in combination with the BTD SNP is what causes the seb derm.
Just a clarification - I can't access the full text, but the abstract refers to oxidative stress, which is a physiological phenomenon - it is not the same as what we usually mean by stress, i.e. psychological stress.Note that eating omega 6 fatty acids will produce Anachidonic Acid.
And stress increases it as well
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16651022
I don't know - maybe it depends on what else you are taking.I thought this morning that I will start taking a B complex instead of biotin on it's own. I think I need to do a complex first to cover perhaps any problems that may occur by taking a single B own it's own. It's that sensible I wonder? I am guessing here. I will add biotin later on and see how it goes.
I don't think that you can know that. It will probably depend on the severity of deficiency, which may not be due to genetic causes in some people.I am not saying you should start at 5000mcg, I am just saying you will not see changes till you get to at least that dose, that is what the doctor who invented the biotinidase test that is giving to infants told me personally.
Just a clarification - I can't access the full text, but the abstract refers to oxidative stress, which is a physiological phenomenon - it is not the same as what we usually mean by stress, i.e. psychological stress.
Both Dear Husband and I always had blood glucose around 88-90, but had many signs (esp. dermatologic) of hyperinsulinemia. If you watch the video about it you will see that glucose might never get out of control while you can produce enough insulin to tame it. No doctor ever requested my insulin levels before i adopted a Paleo-ish diet. After that, whenever I had my fasting insulin tested, I got it below 10 (which is desirable). Last time DH had it checked it was close to 20 (which is undesirable). Now I know that the critical insulin value is actually the one 2 hours after glucose ingestion. It is alarming that doctors and patients think that blood sugar levels are reliable.Do you and 'DH' (husband?) have hyperinsulinaemia? I don't think I have. My blood glucose has always tested OK (both in healthcare settings and at home) apart from briefly during one acute illness.
Yes.To clarify - are you consuming dairy, and getting dandruff because of it? (Personally I don't consume dairy.)
Multiple variations of every single kind except diuretics. They all do it. So do blood thinners. I think my current med is a calcium channel blocker.Which type of blood pressure meds? I know that you were on an ACE inhibitor - did you continue taking this?
That's the thing, I have always been very careful with minerals and vitamins because it is all so complex. There are so many interactions between them all and my thought has been that the last thing I need is to provoke more imbalance. That's why I try to eat a wide variety of foods. But I understand many with gut problems cannot do that.I don't know - maybe it depends on what else you are taking.
I have looked at my multivitamin, and it contains high levels of most B vitamins (very high for some) except folic acid and biotin. I should be getting plenty of folate in my vegan diet, so maybe the high levels of the other Bs are a partial cause for apparent possible (relative?) biotin deficiency.
BTW I asked for Vitamins D and B12 to be tested when I gave blood samples recently, and B12 was above the normal range (doc said that if I took a lot of B12 there was no cause for concern) but I have started taking one of these tablets every other day instead of every day.
That paper says that it reduced ROS:Psychological stress will increase ROS
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14512175
(Surprising, perhaps, but it was a very small study)The acute laboratory stress resulted in a suppressed circadian rhythm of ROS production and in a decreased overall formation of ROS throughout the day.
It is alarming that doctors and patients think that blood sugar levels are reliable.