Countrygirl
Senior Member
- Messages
- 5,638
- Location
- UK
7 500!!!!
I think it's more that it would be unprecedented for so many patients to raise an objection to a guideline. NICE can just ignore it, but then they can no longer claim to be listening to patients. It also allows the MEA and other pro-patient groups to point to evidence of patient support.Is there some critical number which once reached will oblige NICE to change their minds? I wish there were, but doubt it, unless I've missed a crucial point somewhere about a critical number of signatures on a patient organisation's petition suddenly being able to override NICE's considerable decision-making autonomy.
That's a good answer, but I suspect NICE would have a simple explanation for the lack of precedence: namely that ME/CFS is an illness that makes its sufferers uniquely militant in the face of treatment guidelines that don't meet with their approval. Given this, masses of signatures would be seen not so much as an indication of the need for change as a symptom of the condition the signatories are suffering from.I think it's more that it would be unprecedented for so many patients to raise an objection to a guideline. NICE can just ignore it, but then they can no longer claim to be listening to patients. It also allows the MEA and other pro-patient groups to point to evidence of patient support.
It is a line that is getting harder to sell, as more and more of the real story comes out.I suspect NICE would have a simple explanation for the lack of precedence: namely that ME/CFS is an illness that makes its sufferers uniquely militant in the face of treatment guidelines that don't meet with their approval.
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 probably.Is there some critical number which once reached will oblige NICE to change their minds?
That's finite at least, Barry, so might be doable. I take it signatures written by bacteria count.10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 probably.
Nope! Finite it may be, but so far as NICE is concerned any number will probably be deemed infinite.That's finite at least, Barry, so might be doable. I take it signatures written by bacteria count.
Is there some critical number which once reached will oblige NICE to change their minds? I wish there were, but doubt it, unless I've missed a crucial point somewhere about a critical number of signatures on a patient organisation's petition suddenly being able to override NICE's considerable decision-making autonomy.
Having 10,000+ signatures will also provide our parliamentary colleagues with something to work with….
That occurred to me, but I was worried there might be 10,000 CBT practitioners who'd sign it! Would be interesting to see, though.Perhaps someone could start a petition in support of NOT reviewing the NICE guideline - seriously!
There may just be someone out there who would like to support the current NICE guideline
And we could not then be accused of failing to provide another option in support of NICE
CS
This is better than the general election
@Countrygirl - I almost didn't even look at this thread because I had assumed I could not sign, being a furriner and all
It might be good if you could indicate in the title that non-UK residents can sign -
That occurred to me, but I was worried there might be 10,000 CBT practitioners who'd sign it! Would be interesting to see, though.
Edit: Frankly, that stakeholder list made it look like there might be 10,000 therapists out there...