I suspect her diagrams find it convenient to omit most genes which aren't on her test. And as her test seems to be based on convenience and the creation of non-existent problems, rather than actual relevance to methylation, it's not surprising that most of the folate cycle is missing.Yasko has a lot to answer for in this respect. She seems to have kicked off a lot of the myths about BH4 and its links to the folate cycle. Her misreading of research and diagrams has been endlessly repeated.
As a side note, a mainstream MD has attempted to Yasko my mother just in the past few days. Fortunately she asked me about it first, and I was able to explain that most of it is quite meaningless. She forwarded my nice comments back to the doctor, who did back off from it, but still thinks that the slightly better version of VDR Taq (Yasko's +/+) is a reason to closely monitor Vitamin D levels in her patients
It's incredible how far misinformation can spread with sufficient enthusiasm and savvy marketing