I think one of the things with my daughter is that we were very patient. Some of the main things that were helpful needed us to stick with them over a long period of time. I don't think you can be as sick as many are and expect quick results, unfortunately. Wouldn't have made a good Twitter story!
And a lot of their reports seem very designed to just make a good Twitter story. Just kinda rubs me the wrong way with their, "Let's talk about neuroinflammation!" threads where they regurgitate long running hypotheses but present them as accepted truth. I do hope they create some good research data points and get more people experimenting safely, but the hype is just tiring for someone like me that's been pretty damn tired for a couple decades.
If there really were absolute answers that worked for everyone, people would just do them. Like if you cut yourself, you generally put a bandage on it to stop the bleeding, not spend six years researching why cuts bleed. If there's no absolute answer, then you just have to find what works for you.
I also dislike when people have immensely complex healing regimens, but also present them as absolutely effective. Because then you can always have an excuse if the patient doesn't improve. "Oh, well you took the methylation vitamins I recommended and the cofactors plus the herbal antibiotics and the biofilm busters, but you're getting worse because your toxin load was too high and you didn't take the right binders beforehand..." All may be true, or may be a load of pseudoscience - pretty hard to know.
I probably just have a chip on my shoulder about it from all the confident doctors I saw over the years from infectious disease, to rheumatology, to naturopaths, to ME/CFS specialists, to lyme disease, to Shoemaker proteges, to SIBO, and so forth. All sure I would get better if I followed their suggestions, then nothing.