Meyers stuff
Hi, all; I did indicate doubts about Meyers--I put it that way because the review is not dated, and it seems at least possible that he wrote the review before taking a position with MRS--which I was aware of. So I indicated doubt, but not total disbelief---the guy may be an honest guy happy to make some money selling something he believes is good.
It is disturbing that the MRS, and maybe the Bemer too, is sold on a kind of pyramid scheme--you can become a seller and then rope in other sellers and make more money as you take a commission on the units sold by those selling under you. That helps explain the exorbitant price these things fetch.
But I think it is important to focus on what they can do for us, and that seems to be a lot. Machines working on the basic principle have now been reuniting broken bones for many years, and I will quote from Naomi Shupak's (she is a bona fide academic) review of their therapeutic uses (I gave the ref a while back).
"To date, of the articles included in this review, magnetic-field stimulation was shown to be effective for treatment of bone disorders (osteotomies, non-union bone fractures, congenital Pseudoarthrosis, bone formation, hip arthroplasty), joint disorders (including rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis), rotator-cuff tendonitis, spinal fusions....pelvic pain, neurological disorders (e.g. mutiple sclerosis, tinnitus), nerve (median-ulnar, peroneal, sciatic) regeneration, endocrine ophthalmopathy, cancer, focal ischemia, cardiac and myocardial protection, and human standing balance."
Not bad--and she is using a huge list of published articles as the basis for that claim. Alas, not good for everything: "as yet inconclusive for conditions such as osteoporosis, venous leg ulcers, imbalance of the neuroendocrine system..and pain."
Oh, and they are used on race horses too, and there is real money there--they must help!
So OK, they don't cure everything, though there is some evidence for their being useful for osteoporosis and leg ulcers and certainly pain--can testify to that for myself. And not all these things were done by machines like the ones we use--hospitals use specialized zappers for broken bone fusion, I believe. But still pretty impressive!
Just how they work is still not completely clear as she acknowledges, and neither is the optimal wave form and so on, but progress is being made--her essay is dated 2003. So let's forget about Meyer's dubious position and enjoy the benefits of some remarkable if over -priced machines. But if they continue to work as they seem to be doing for those of us lucky enough to have access to them, cheap at the price. One can pay more and get less--much less.
Best to all, Chris.