I am sure that we can think of many nutritional deficiencies that will cause havoc for the human body. But the more important question is: do you believe ME/CFS can be reduced to a nutritional deficiency?
Here are 3 studies that all show that riboflavin deficiency leads to
reduced liver contents of iron:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9197927
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15539220
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3676194
Now, if riboflavin deficiency leads to reduced liver contents of iron, wouldn't it make sense to conclude that riboflavin repletion would increase liver stores of iron?
Adreno,
This is very interesting. It seems that weagree that b2 is needed to increase iron, however whether the liver is low in iron and needs b2 to help store it or high in iron and needs b2 to release it is something I don't know. Christine obviously thinks the liver is high in iron. Unfortunately, she has not published a paper fully explaining her theory. I would think the ideal way to solve this question is with liver biopsies, and since Christine has done quite a few liver biopsies on dogs with what she said had similar problems to humans, I'm assuming she found high contents of iron in their livers. However this is just an assumption; I don't think she has explicitly said that.
To specifically address those studies, I would guess that the rats were perfectly healthy to begin with and had good mineral/vitamin balances. It would be better if they ate a SAD first which has high amounts of non-heme iron in cereals and white flour and low manganese. Then their livers could be checked for iron levels before and after a specifically riboflavin deficient diet is started. Also, there are several studies saying that non-heme iron decreases manganese levels. Christine thinks that manganese is vital to proper formations of the ER structures that store iron. So is it possible that there is a lot of iron being stored incorrectly? In other words, I'm not sure that the studies can support the jump in reasoning that our livers are low in iron. At the same time you may be correct; I just don't know. I think it would be helpful to know if to "cure" the rats, the investigators added back b2 or iron or both?
To give a little bit of personal experience to add to the collective database of knowledge
, my 2.5yo started becoming extremely aggressive, would "lose" words (start saying a couple phrases and then never say them again until at points he just never said any words), and would nap for 4-5 hours without having restorative sleep--wake up very tired, stay very grouchy for 2-3 hours after waking up, circles under eyes, etc. I started him on the children's dose size recommended on the WaterOZ manganese bottle as well as b2 in the dosage recommended in the multivitamin his doctor had suggested and tiny amounts of b12 less than the dosage recommended for his age. These were his only supplements (I stopped the multivitamin since after 6 months, it did not help in any obvious way). Within 2 days he was counting to six and every day since he has added a new entire phrase (I love you, what is that, etc) to his vocabulary. He does not hit, bite or throw things anymore and he sleeps only 2.5 hours a day and wakes up easily and happily. This vitamin combination has done wonderful things for me too. Therefore, I think a lot of what Christine says has merit, but that obviously does not mean everything is correct. I have eliminated cereals and foods with added iron (non-organic white flour and rice), but we both eat meat, whole grains, chocolate and food cooked in cast iron pans so our diets do still have iron in them. Since starting this, my son does crave oatmeal which has quite a bit of natural iron and he does not like dairy which can inhibit the absorption of iron (I don't know if it also inhibits the absorption of Mn too). As I mentioned earlier, my ferritin levels are increasing without taking any iron supplements. However, I do not see anything in my personal experience to contradict the low iron storage theory.
Since Christine cannot contribute, the continuation of this thread is a great way to explore/test/discuss what little we know of her theories.