Dreambirdie
work in progress
- Messages
- 5,569
- Location
- N. California
@chipmunk1 There are a lot of actions being taken to help Karina, but so far none have succeeded. And yes, it seems to be an appalling violation of human rights.
i don't understand why she is still being held. How can this be legal?
Bodily distress syndrome is not even a mental health disorder according to Dr. Fink.
If BDS is not a true psychiatric disorder how can Dr. Fink justify kidnapping an adult?
Is it legal to force an adult terminal cancer patient to undergo chemotherapy?
If it legal to lock a chain smoker up to make him quit cigarettes?
What kind of doctor would do that?
The parents should sue the hospital and the doctors and the courts need to wake up see that what is being done is a human rights violation.
as if disability benefits would even come close to the expense of keeping a person in hospital for two years.
these people are cruel, self-seving psychopaths with a bunch of letters after their names.
okay another point that really irritates me in this circular thinking is that if anyone in the last 30 years had taken these illnesses seriously, done rigorous research, made available treatments that could bring back some degree of wellness and autonomy, then these "mind-boggling" financial burdens would not exist. he's basically saying "it costs too much to treat the patients to whom we have been grossly medically negligent."Fink associate Rick Steele has said,“The common endpoint for these syndromes [medically unexplained syndromes, including GWS, CFS PVS, etc.] is a disability pension. The enormity of this problem boggles the mind. Merely supporting this group of patients financially rivals half of the public outlays for health care or social benefits in northern European countries..."
okay another point that really irritates me in this circular thinking is that if anyone in the last 30 years had taken these illnesses seriously, done rigorous research, made available treatments that could bring back some degree of wellness and autonomy, then these "mind-boggling" financial burdens would not exist. he's basically saying "it costs too much to treat the patients to whom we have been grossly medically negligent."
and that's not even addressing an insulting an dehumanizing commentary that reduces people's health care tragedies to an undesirable financial "outcome".
Merely supporting this group of patients financially rivals half of the public outlays for health care or social benefits in northern European countries...
"(during Summer 2013) NBC shall have given Karina the very rare psychiatric diagnosis 'Pervasive Arousal Withdrawal Syndrome' (PAWS).
PRS is very rare and its cause is unclear, but its severity makes it life-threatening.The disorder usually begins with a 'virus', or the child having a 'pain', that results in the need for consulting a doctor or going to the hospital, even though no substantial cause can be found. PRS starts slowly, but the child then worsens quickly becoming reluctant or not capable to do anything for themselves.[3] They originally refuse to accept others caring for them, or helping them eat, and are very depressed and distraught
Learned helplessness model[edit][/SIZE]
Seligman's (1990) model of learned helplessness embodies that the learned expectation of having no control over matters in the environment is met with a generalized passivity response.[11] It is speculated that the interactions between the child and events in their surroundings can end in the child encountering feelings of helplessness and therefore, a loss of personal hopefulness.[11] The patient is scared to take part in the world and feels inadequate in facing internal and externalexperiences, which he or she experiences through the world and thinking about his or her emotional encounters.[11] This model is effective in explaining the degradation in children with PRS when trying to rehabilitate them. If the child or adolescent is experiencing the treatment intervention as forceful, then their feeling of helplessness increases.[11]
Thompson and Nunn were the first to introduce diagnostic criteria for PRS in 1997. The current diagnostic criteria consists of:[7]
- A) Partial or complete refusal in three or more of the following areas: (1) eating, (2) moving, (3) speech, (4) interest to personal care
- B) Active and angry resistance to acts of help and support
- C) Social withdrawal and school refusal
- D) No organic condition accounts for the severity of the degree of symptoms
- E) No other psychiatric disorder could better account for the symptoms
- F) The endangered state of the patient requires hospitalization[7]
would like to see statistics supporting this claim.