I'm not sure where you get that idea. There has been a plethora of helpful research in the past few years. I know I've benefited tremendously from reading the studies and working with my doctors to develop treatments plans atound what the science has shown.
Please share this research so I can use it to find a treatment and get my life back (my job, my hobbies, my friends, my health, my desire to live ...). We are all here on this forum and a good percentage of us have lost almost everything and I dont see a systematic solution that has any general applicability. I'm sure if there was even a sliver of scientific explanation for CFS we all wouldn't be in this predicament.
I am happy you have gotten better but I really doubt this was based on any scientific research. Many of us are getting worse. Is it because we are mis-applying science to our treatments? did we snooze on the latest research? I have been treated by the Kaufman clinic (Open Medicine Institute in Mountain View) and the CFS clinic at Stanford (Dr Montoya). I am a lot worse now than last year. What happened to the science? did the science somehow favor you over me?
Did you confuse your own improvements based on your own trial and errors with systematic science-based treatment? did you confuse all these studies that are coming out of Ron Davis' lab with a "scientific explanation"? because it is not. They are just hard at work trying to prove the disease "exists". Which is far from trying to formulate an underlying causative pathology, let alone a treatment option (correlation doesn't equal causation). Of course they hype up their research since the whole endeavor is donation based. Half of research is really marketing even in computer science (my own field). Of course what they are doing is a great first step, but far from saying we have a scientific disease/treatment model.
Right now I can find CFS research that would attribute CFS to:
- Gut bacteria
- brain inflammation
- viral infection
- ATP dysfunction
- blood cell anomalies
- cardiac issues
- candida and fungal infections
- mold
- autoimmune issues
- and now musculoskeletal causes since Jeff got cured by having spinal fusion
And I can keep going. This doesn't look like we are anywhere to understanding CFS, its causes or its treatment. It's a confused smorgasbord of small groups around the world just trying to find correlations from small sample sizes and then forming a half-assed hypothesis based on that. Does this look like we have a scientific basis for CFS?
Where did
I get the idea that there is no scientific understanding of CFS? No, where did
you get the idea that there is one?