frozenborderline
Senior Member
- Messages
- 4,405
So I agree with david bell's work about low blood volume in ME/CFS and also how the disease resembles a less emergent, slower sepsis or septic/hyoovolemic shock with adaptations that make it barely livable. Not just low blood volume, there is often high Lactate especially after activity, and hypoperfusion to some organs especially the brain ...
The hearts role in this and the energetic dysfunction driving this at cellular level have been thoroughly documented by paul cheney, with his upright echocardiograms that showed diastolic dysfunction. All of this is similar to david systroms findings. For some reason, the heart just doesnt pump enough blood to brain especially while upright, and has preload failure where the blood isnt getting g from leg veins up to the heart , either.
David bell found IV saline helped a lot, albeit temporarily. I have found that too.
He also found that blood transfusions helped more dramatically... like long term remissions, fron a single infusion. That doesnt happen with saline.
Now this makes me wonder if blood volume is one aspect but the "unknown factor" that multiple groups have found in me/cfs plasma that is toxic , has to do with why blood transfusions would help, and why very regular saline infusions may help (diluting the bad factor in the blood, even if you cannot do plasmapheresis).
Why haven't more me/cfs docs tried blood transfusions, its gotta be easier than plasmapheresis approval or whatever?
But anyway, back to the sepsis idea. I thought, if we are truly trying to quickly correct volume and also help endothelial dysfunction like happens in sepsis , we should try hypertonic saline. This is risky, and it would make doctors who have patients with hypovolemic hypertension especially nervous. However, it seems like it could be more promising than normal saline and as far as I know nobody had ever tried it, clinically OR in a study
So heres the review on its use in septic shock.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137320/
If you read that, there are several crossover things with ME/CFS that could be helpful. Normalizing cytokines, helping with preload pressure , helping with tissue perfusion , and so on and so on.
Of course this is more risk than normal saline but it blows my mind that since it's less risky than suramin and a million times cheaper nobody has proposed a clinical trial...
Someone should propose this to dr levine or some ME/CFS doc who still follows the dr bell conventional wisdom about low blood volume in me/cfs and how that causes the pots and many of the other issues
@Hip @sb4 @Whit @Janet Dafoe @Wayne @rpapen77 @jeff_w
The hearts role in this and the energetic dysfunction driving this at cellular level have been thoroughly documented by paul cheney, with his upright echocardiograms that showed diastolic dysfunction. All of this is similar to david systroms findings. For some reason, the heart just doesnt pump enough blood to brain especially while upright, and has preload failure where the blood isnt getting g from leg veins up to the heart , either.
David bell found IV saline helped a lot, albeit temporarily. I have found that too.
He also found that blood transfusions helped more dramatically... like long term remissions, fron a single infusion. That doesnt happen with saline.
Now this makes me wonder if blood volume is one aspect but the "unknown factor" that multiple groups have found in me/cfs plasma that is toxic , has to do with why blood transfusions would help, and why very regular saline infusions may help (diluting the bad factor in the blood, even if you cannot do plasmapheresis).
Why haven't more me/cfs docs tried blood transfusions, its gotta be easier than plasmapheresis approval or whatever?
But anyway, back to the sepsis idea. I thought, if we are truly trying to quickly correct volume and also help endothelial dysfunction like happens in sepsis , we should try hypertonic saline. This is risky, and it would make doctors who have patients with hypovolemic hypertension especially nervous. However, it seems like it could be more promising than normal saline and as far as I know nobody had ever tried it, clinically OR in a study
So heres the review on its use in septic shock.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137320/
If you read that, there are several crossover things with ME/CFS that could be helpful. Normalizing cytokines, helping with preload pressure , helping with tissue perfusion , and so on and so on.
Of course this is more risk than normal saline but it blows my mind that since it's less risky than suramin and a million times cheaper nobody has proposed a clinical trial...
Someone should propose this to dr levine or some ME/CFS doc who still follows the dr bell conventional wisdom about low blood volume in me/cfs and how that causes the pots and many of the other issues
@Hip @sb4 @Whit @Janet Dafoe @Wayne @rpapen77 @jeff_w