Hi Rich,
I am responding to your last post on this chain a piece at a time. There will be additional segments.
Richvank Said:
And to tell people with CFS that they should avoid glutathione because it produced problems for freddd just does not make sense, in my opinion
and I object to applying his personal results directly to explaining what goes on in everyone who has CFS.
Rich, that is more than a simple misstatement. I object to you so blatently ignoring or misrepresenting most everything I say except what you can use to support your theories. So, I will aid you in making sense of what I have actually said about the whole thing, latest version as I have included details from several different posts and have had further understanding as time and additional changes have occurred. My results were duplicated in kind by each and every person. What differed was the degree. I had the longest lasting and possibly the most severe response. I also had the longest last symptoms and the most damage, especially severe damage not yet healed. However, the longer each person continued the worse and more widespread were the symptoms returning. Also I am very sensitive to the effects of Metafolin and it's lack. That was the quickest and most severe induced deficiency in all persons and is the main set of symptoms for socalled "glutathione detox". Not only do you appear to ignore each time I tell you that there were multiple people who had the same types of results as I had with glutathione infusions, gluathione in some other way, NAC/L-glutamine, some other combinations of a cysteine and gluitamine precursors and undenatured whey. As is common here many people are experimenting with diets of one kind or limited by major food intolerances. I was both a vegetarian and had limited foods choice because of food intolerances and frequent nausea. Some people had CFS/FMS diagnosis, some had b12 deficiency diagnosis and some had no diagnoses or tons of others. Mosr of us started at the same time and nobody spoke up with results until I mentioned that I was unable to continue the trial at 6 weeks because of the severity and nature of the responses being clear. It became clear as various people posted or emailed me with their results that 100% of the people who had responses, 100% of the people who announced that they were going to try glutathione, had been taking mb12, adb12 and often Metafolin or Folinic Acid for some period of time and had achieved a substantial amount of healing. A couple of people who had been taking glutathione at the time we posted our results who had not been getting results with mb12/adb12/Metafolin then discontinued glutamine and slowly started getting results. Having glutathione on board appears to completely prevent mb12/adb12/Metafolin startup responses of any kind and also prevents any healing from taking place. The startup is very slow after quitting glutathione which is not surprising considering how long the results lasted for me and some others. While I had a batch of startup responses with the first dose of each MB12 and ADB12 following 4.8mg of Metafolin I had delayed startup of epidermal healing until 18-19 months following cessation of glutathione, reinstating the condition that prevailed just before starting glutathione.
I suppose that to put a different light on this is that we have found a way to STOP Metafolin/methylb12 startup responses very quickly though nobody has tested that hypothesis yet.
A number of us tried the glutathione precursors. One guy is a vegetarian, a couple more might be. Every one of them has or had a bunch of b12 deficiency symptoms. Several had FMS/CFS diagnoses. Some took precursors and some glutathione infusions or other form. Every one of the persons had been taking the active b12s, most with metafolin, for some months to years before trying the glutathione. Every one of them had a good deal of correction of symptoms and healing while taking the active b12s except several persons who had been taking the glutathione the entire time. Every one of the persons involved had a sudden resurgence of symptoms when they took the glutathione and the longer they took the glutathione the worse the returned deficiency symptoms got. After stopping the glutathione, large doses of metafolin and active b12s caused some startup responses all over again and noticably started reversing the induced symptoms within hours. The only similarity of all the people responding as I did was that they had already significant improvment from the mb12/adb12/metafolin. If people had been taking hycbl or nothing they appear to not have the return of those affected symptoms because those sysmptoms had never gone away in the first place so there was no return of those deficiency symptoms, they had never gone away.
It's very simple. The glutathione started causing the return of selected methylb12 deficiency symptoms, the return of selected adenosylb12 deficiency symptoms and selected metafolin deficiency symptoms. If a person hasn't had those specific symptoms go away in the first place how could they possibly be felt returning? Since folic acid and hycbl doesn't affect those symptoms in the first place there is no basis of comparison. Either the person didn't have them orioginally or they alrady had the same symptoms and had never seen them go away so thereby unable to return. However, after a while some folks taking inactive cobalamin and folates did develop "glutathione detox reaction" which is quite widespread. This reaction is composed of Metafolin deficiency symptoms, methylb12 deficiency symptoms and adb12 deficiency symptoms. When some of these folks then tried the metafolin, mb12 and adb12 they were able to reverse the "glutathione detox reaction" very quickly.
Speculation on the role of methylb12 involving glutathione.
Taking everything into account it appears that excess (whatever that actually means) glutathione is treated as a toxin by methylb12. It promptly forms glutathionylcbl from mb12 and then is flushed much more rapidly from the body via the kidneys, much more like cycbl, than mb12. This difference is easily visible by anybody taking large enough doses of mb12. The level of red in the urine was characteristic of approximately doubling the dose of mb12. Again this is shared by everybody taking enough mb12 to visibly color the urine. As mb12 has been shown to have dose proportionate healing response up to 1500mcg daily dose and in other research up to approximately 50,000mcg daily, though the curve may have a essentially level zone between lower dose proportionality and higher dose proportionality, lots of people, hundreds to thousands so far, that have posted or corresponded with me about the powerful healing effects of "well in excess of transport system saturation doses" of methylb12. When that unbound mb12 disappears and the unbound adb12 disappears, then the effectiveness more or less disappears. I am far far far from alone in this. This is the majority response to mb12/adb12, not the response of one person.
As it turns out my results are much more predictive of favorable results than any prediction of results on the simplified methylation program.
We need to do 1-2 year symptom/sign matched pair and maybe with 50% crossover at 6-12 months study to see the very real differences which I am quite willing to predict and bet will be there.