ahmo
Senior Member
- Messages
- 4,805
- Location
- Northcoast NSW, Australia
Ha! The French translation has been published by "Edition Asklepios". It seems my powers of creating the World are at their best. Synchronicity being the fruit of good health.
Ha! The French translation has been published by "Edition Asklepios". It seems my powers of creating the World are at their best. Synchronicity being the fruit of good health.
Ha! The French translation has been published by "Edition Asklepios". It seems my powers of creating the World are at their best. Synchronicity being the fruit of good health.
A small update :
We are still on the regular protocol (MO-FR Mucokehl + Nigersan) and SA-SU Exmykehl).
@jepps
I think what I said all along about Fake Folate poisoning i right, and that Fake Folates, since the 1670 years have poisoned people by encouraging fungi overgrowth
I just read a very interesting book by a French philosopher, about the food and the illnesses of philosophers :
Onfray : Le ventre des philosophes. http://www.amazon.fr/Ventre-philosophes-Critique-raison-diététique/dp/2253053821/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427990686&sr=1-1&keywords=ventre onfray
in English : http://www.amazon.co.uk/Appetites-Thought-Philosophers-Michel-Onfray/dp/1780234457
I do not know if it has been translated into German.
This is very interesting because it shows clearly how people were poisoned by folic cid supplementation due to Liebig and Marmite etc.
May the love of God shine on all of us. We do not deserve this. Sometimes when I feel really well I am so sad that not everyone is feeling well too.
SANUKEHLs are haptens and bring hidden cell wall microorganisms starting to emerge, so
that our immune defense is able to detect it. With their help, a "blind" Recovery cell wall microorganism could be treated
without side effects.
These are the products:
• SANUKEHL Myc D6 taking Mondays
• SANUKEHL Staph D6 taking Tuesdays
• SANUKEHL Prot D6 taking Wednesdays
• SANUKEHL Strep D6 taking Thursdays
• SANUKEHL Pseu D6 taking Fridays
• SANUKEHL Salm D6 Einnahme Saturday
5 drops in the morning and in the evening (before meals)
For viral infections (when chronic viruses get acute because of treating fungi) there are the following sanum products :
- Notakehl for all symptoms of the head: nose, paranasal symptoms, sinuses
- Quentakehl for all symptoms of the bladder, kidneys, sciatic nerves, bronchia
There’s a great quote from a book called An Epidemic of Absence, which I highly recommend if you’re interested in this subject, and the quote is that: “It is now widely appreciated that humans did not evolve as a single species, but rather that humans and the microbiomes associated with us have co-evolved as a ‘super-organism,’ and that our evolution as a species and the evolution of our associated microbiomes have always been intertwined,” and that’s from the beginning of one of the chapters in the book. It’s from a physician or researcher named William Parker from Duke University. So, what this means is that our immune system probably evolved in part as an adaptation to the microorganisms that we were hosting for millions of years and more importantly that our immune system may not be able to function optimally without the presence of these microorganisms. That’s the weirdest thing to get your head around because in the modern kind of sanitary conditions we’ve done everything we possibly can to eradicate these organisms from our systems, and now we’re learning that eradicating these organisms might have profound impacts that we didn’t really foresee.
This was in reference to the effect of EMFs on our internal microorganisms, which seems to be vast.
Does anyone here with candida or mold issues, experience worse symptoms during barometric pressure drops?
@melamine I bought a grounding sheet and grounding mat a couple years ago. the mat I use under my arms at the computer. When I was deep in the process of detox, I was lying on a sheepskin. When I asked my body, I got a response that this was as good as the grounding sheet I purchased. Every time since that I've self-tested re whether this wool is really giving me as much benefit as the sheet, I get a Yes. I've substituted wool mattress covers for the sheepskin, for ease of laundering. I found that my body likes the mattress covers that have been stitched, rather than the ones with the fused backing. I've cut a couple old ones into strips, so I can just have contact through my legs. I get similar + responses to raw wool, but not to wool blankets. Worth a try...I guess you'd know if it was doing any good if you stop giving of sparks
Here's a fascinating vid re EMFs:
Resonance Beings of Frequency re EMF, melatonin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=oS6FGzh3ygw
For me too, totally unrelated. Just recently I had to switch a screen monitor. Apparently a brand with better reputation takes more care with the construction of these thing even though all of them come from the same palce. Not sure. I heve read many complaints about apple (I use PC).Something I've noticed is that there seems to be no relation between the intensity of EMF nervous system activation and the sparky symptom.
The only source which seems to be mentioned is a German book written 90 years ago. It doesn't strike me as a particularly reliable source, especially if the claims within have not been peer-reviewed and published in a journal, nor replicated by anyone else.
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (JRSM)
What is clear is that the forms of peer review are protean. Probably the systems of every journal and every grant giving body are different in at least some detail; and some systems are very different. There may even be some journals using the following classic system. The editor looks at the title of the paper and sends it to two friends whom the editor thinks know something about the subject. If both advise publication the editor sends it to the printers. If both advise against publication the editor rejects the paper. If the reviewers disagree the editor sends it to a third reviewer and does whatever he or she advises. This pastiche—which is not far from systems I have seen used—is little better than tossing a coin, because the level of agreement between reviewers on whether a paper should be published is little better than you'd expect by chance.
But does peer review 'work' at all? A systematic review of all the available evidence on peer review concluded that 'the practice of peer review is based on faith in its effects, rather than on facts'.
Peer review might also be useful for detecting errors or fraud. At the BMJ we did several studies where we inserted major errors into papers that we then sent to many reviewers. Nobody ever spotted all of the errors. Some reviewers did not spot any, and most reviewers spotted only about a quarter. Peer review sometimes picks up fraud by chance, but generally it is not a reliable method for detecting fraud because it works on trust. A major question, which I will return to, is whether peer review and journals should cease to work on trust.
So we have little evidence on the effectiveness of peer review, but we have considerable evidence on its defects. In addition to being poor at detecting gross defects and almost useless for detecting fraud it is slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, something of a lottery, prone to bias, and easily abused.
So peer review is a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works. Nevertheless, it is likely to remain central to science and journals because there is no obvious alternative, and scientists and editors have a continuing belief in peer review. How odd that science should be rooted in belief.