General Summary
From a good document at
https://valtsus.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-therapeutic-effects-of-red-and-near.html:
* Red light and near-infrared irradiation produce measurable changes locally in cells/tissues/organs. This form of light therapy is called photobiomodulation (PBM).
* Animal studies show that photobiomodulation therapy could be beneficial for over 100 different diseases. Evidence from human studies is also emerging in a fast pace.
* Over 3000 photobiomodulation papers have been published in PubMed-indexed journals, over 120 of which have a good impact factor (> 3.0). Research has been conducted in 40 different countries.
Dose and duration:
* Dose is difficult to adjust when using a DIY approach (eg. security light) but a light meter can help (eg. Tenmars TM-206 ~$130-150)
* Duration: Try 10 minutes per day. Takes quite awhile for healing to take place.
* Dosing is bi-phasic, too little doesn't work, too much doesn't work. "Low-to-moderate doses of light are often described as stimulating and high doses as inhibitory, because some markers that can be increased by low doses of light, have been shown to decrease with excessive light doses." (
https://valtsus.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-therapeutic-effects-of-red-and-near.html)
Signs of overdoing it:
* "If the benefits go away after continual usage, that’s a sign of overuse."
* Headaches
* Excess fatigue
Criticism is usually outdated
(from
https://valtsus.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-therapeutic-effects-of-red-and-near.html):
Many skeptic websites and blogs also have claimed that photobiomodulation (LLLT) is mostly a form of quackery. These sites include Science-Based Medicine, Skeptic North, SkeptVet, Device Watch and also the Wikipedia page on LLLT. These criticisms present some of the weaknesses of the photobiomodulation (PBM) research fairly, but since most of the PBM research has been published since the 2010, most of these criticisms are outdated and I would trust recent systematic reviews more than these articles that are mostly based on some quick internet searches.
Use for kidney disease
Full article:
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/02/26/photobiomodulation.aspx
A Harvard specialist in phototherapy (Dr. Hamblin) has said:
"Kidney failure is the third leading cause of death. These are old folks who are dying from kidney failure. You can’t really give them transplants because they’re elderly. You put a near-infrared LED array where their kidneys are and it seems to work like a dream. [But] it’s hardly been studied at all..."
Excerpts from an interview with Dr. Hamblin
(
https://www.selfhacked.com/blog/int...arvard-professor-and-infrared-therapy-expert/):
* Photons are absorbed by chromophores in the mitochondria.
* Nitric oxide increases,
* Mitochondria changes that are good,
* Signaling – from ROS, Non cAMP,
* Burst of ROS,
* cAMP from extra ATP,
* Activates transcription factors to create new proteins.
Light has effects days or weeks after.
* He puts it on in the morning on some part of his body, elbow (if sore), knee (if sore), eyes, forehead, and any part of his anatomy that could use some boosting…..
* He uses it on his forehead for 15 minutes 2X a week (forehead because hair blocks a lot of the light).
* Light therapy reduces glutamate, so it stops the parts of the brain that are overexcited.
* LLLT [low-level light therapy] only increases inflammation transiently in people without any baseline inflammation. In people with inflammation, LLLT only has an anti-inflammatory effect.
* Causes a small increase in cellular calcium.
* LEDs seem to work better than lamps but he doesn't understand why.
* NIR and FAR are both effective [in different ways presumably].
* Doesn't think IR LEDs can damage eyesight. "LEDs and light therapy can be good for autoimmune thyroid antibodies. It probably works by decreasing systemic inflammation."
* Not aware of any negative studies.
Useful low cost IR emitter
https://www.amazon.ca/CMVision-IR13...1535905894&sr=8-1&keywords=CMVision+IR130-198
* CMVision CM-IR130
* 198 IR LEDS
* 850 nm
* Amazon.com review: "You'll also be glad to know that it was my doctor, who is more a friend, and is into natural healing, that told me about it and said that this was the Right one for the proper healing! He has used it, this exact model, and it helped him immensely, so he told me to get it for my problem..."
* Other Amazon.com reviewers have used the same model for LLLT as well.