Could you cite your source for magnesium’s classification as a CNS depressant? It flies in the face of everything I know about mg, Please help me out.
Magnesium's function as a CNS depressant is widely known and can be easily verified. If you simply type "magnesium CNS" into Google, Google's first suggestion is "magnesium cns depressant." If you select this suggestion, you will get pages and pages of results, some more relevant than others. In quite a few places, the action of magnesium as a CNS depressant is spelled out completely explicitly. For example,
Daily Med, the official provider of FDA label information, says, "Magnesium is said to have a depressant effect on the central nervous system (CNS)..." From
wellrx.com: "Because of the CNS-depressant effects of magnesium sulfate..." From the article
Magnesium—Essentials for Anesthesiologists: "In the central nervous system, magnesium exerts depressant effects, acting as an antagonist at the
N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor..." The package insert (prescribing information) for Magnesium Sulfate Injection, USP 50% says, under Indications and Usage:
Magnesium Sulfate Injection, USP 50% may be of therapeutic value in the following conditions:
- as a CNS depressant, primarily in preeclampsia and eclampsia of pregnancy;
There are many, many other such high quality references just among the first few pages of results.
Magnesium’s action on NMDA receptors consists of magnesium ions blocking the ion channel pore of NMDA receptors.
More specifically, there is a magnesium binding site on the NMDA receptor. When magnesium binds to this site, the actions you describe then follow.
Searching for "magnesium cns depressant NMDA" provides a number of relevant examples of how magnesium interacts with the NMDA receptor. For example, the journal article
Magnesium as a Neuroprotective Agent states that magnesium "has a depressant effect at the postsynaptic membrane through the voltage-dependent block of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors." Although the CNS is not mentioned explicitly here, NMDA receptors occur throughout the CNS in huge quantities, so when they do, the depressant effect mentioned at the NMDA receptors is a CNS depressant effect.
The previous quote from
Magnesium—Essentials for Anesthesiologists applies to this question of yours as well, being even more specific. Once again, there are quite a few high quality search results connecting magnesium's CNS depressant effects with its actions at the NMDA receptor.
The “I heard from people that ….” thing is not a dependable information source. How did they know it was the magnesium causing the problems?
In the case of respiratory depression from parenteral magnesium, the answer is simple: The respiratory depression occurs within minutes of the magnesium administration, and the people I communicated with had never experienced respiratory depression before or since. I personally know of a couple of cases that occurred as a result of Epsom salt foot baths(!), and one of these people ended up in the ER. The doctors there were unable to provide a diagnosis.
How do you know what else they might have been taking that could have worked synergistically with the mag to create these problems, or could have actually created the problems independent of mag?
As some of these cases were quite surprising to me, I enquired as to what other medications the person was taking, and none of them were capable of causing CNS or respiratory depression either on their own, or in combination with magnesium.
Or that this sniveling little sneaky, slithering toad of an illness has created this reaction in them, tho not in all of us.
I personally suspect that this is a factor when combined with magnesium, at least in some cases. It is for this very reason that I felt it advisable to warn of magnesium side effects that may be less common in healthy people, especially when some of these side effects, such as respiratory depression, can be quite dangerous.
I know of only one case where a person experienced respiratory depression from oral magnesium, but this happened multiple times to her, as she took oral magnesium multiple times because she really wanted it to work. As with the other people I talked to, she never experienced respiratory depression outside of these cases. She was extremely sensitive to almost all medications, though, and so I think hers is an outlying case, and I think that the risk of respiratory depression from oral magnesium is negligible, and should not deter people from using it. I mention this possible side effect so that if people experience it while taking oral magnesium, the question of magnesium's involvement could be raised.
There are people in these threads who also react poorly to mag. That doesn’t establish that it’s a CNS depressant.
Certainly not. That's why I have provided the references you requested.
Or that they have another, underlying condition that potentiated the mag dose.
This is indeed very possible. But as our underlying conditions are generally very hard to treat, warning people of magnesium side effects that may occur as a result of an interaction with these conditions seems reasonable to me. I have found that people tend to get rather upset (and understandably so) when they are blindsided by side effects that no one told them about, especially when such side effects are well known (e.g., described in the references I have cited).
Once again, I agree completely. In this case, as in the case of many other anxiolytic drugs, the reduction of symptoms is directly due to the CNS depressant effect of magnesium.
I am quoting myself here because my proofreading failed to catch the error in this sentence; the phrase "the CNS depressant effects of magnesium" at the end of it should be replaced with "their CNS depressant effects." This becomes important when addressing your reply:
First off, mag is NOT in the same class as “ ….. many other anxiolytic drugs ….”. It’s not even in the same galaxy. For one thing, it’s not a drug.
I beg to differ. The Wiktionary defines "drug" as:
- A substance used to treat an illness, relieve a symptom, or modify a chemical process in the body for a specific purpose.
If you Google "magnesium drug," you will find many high quality references that refer to magnesium as a drug.
But again, and I can’t stress this enough, MAGNESIUM IS NOT AN ANXIOLYTIC DRUG, AND IS NOT IN THE SAME CLASS AS “ ….OTHER ANXIOLYTIC DRUGS …”.It never has been, never will be. They’re beyond just apples and oranges, their only similarity is that they’re both carbon based. Some notable anxiolytics are Xanax, Ativan, Valium, Klonipin, Tranxene, none of which work thru the NMDA systems, but thru GABAa systems.
Strictly speaking, most sources consider magnesium to be "anxiolytic-like", although some do simply call it an anxiolytic. As for being carbon-based, magnesium doesn't fit into that category. But the NMDA and GABA systems are in many ways complementary, in that NMDA antagonists (such as magnesium) tend to have many similarities to GABA agonists, and vice versa. In the case of the benzodiazepines that you mentioned, although they are not GABA agonists, they are GABA receptor potentiators, which behave in a similar way.
These are the points you raised that I felt it was the most important to reply to. My health is not all that great, and I don't want to stress it out too much by pushing myself too hard here. Also, I think at some point I have to take mercy on the poor readers (if there are any left after this post).
I would like to close simply by emphasizing a general principle, which is that points I make as general medical knowledge can easily be found with a simple Google search or two. When someone states something that surprises me, or that I don't believe, I'll first check out reliable resources on the Web before replying, as I am very aware that my medical knowledge is quite limited. If you have further questions about what I said, you might want to consider a similar course. Meanwhile, due to my low energy level and current health status, this is about as much as I can do on this topic. Feel free to reply (and I will read any replies), but I need to take a break from long posts for now.
I know we both want the best for everyone on this forum, and I hope that at least a few people have found this discussion edifying.