Out in the real world we have Professor Holgate turning up to SMC briefings with Esther Crawley and feeding the press a load of propaganda about debunked behavioural studies, conflating fatigue with ME, and yet again trying to undermine legitimate criticism from the patient population with buzz-words and phrases like "hostility" and "rising tensions" and "barriers are being put in the way of trials like this"
Where has that come from, have they been reading these threads ? Is there even any point in writing to Holgate to say that we are in favour of good scienctific research into the condition ( as long as BPS issues are addressed) knowing his stance and allegiences here ?
Indeed eafw. Its nonsensical in reality, ergo it reveals such a lot about them. It's not good at all :thumbdown:
I've been on the fence about OMEGA but this morning, seeing what the SMC have done regarding fitnet, I'm beyond distressed and just LIVID about this B*llSh*t study being done, on children... CHILDREN! And based on Dutch research with the same flaws as PACE - outcome thresholds for so called "recovery" being virtually the same as the threshold for being ill enough to be part of the trial, & null results at long term follow up - it's utterly outrageous.
The promotion of an agenda regardless of the evidence.When are they going to grasp that the patients with the CF she diagnoses & treats, probably DO need this kind of intervention & thats wondereful. But it's not M.E.!

& will only be a thorn in the side of those who are truly organically ill.
But this practice of discrediting any opposing voices before they've even spoken, trotting out this line about harrassment again & again, it's totally underhand & sinister imo.
I'm making no accusations but this is the
exact technique abusers use to make sure their victims will not be listened to. Anyone who's been in a domestic violence situation will tell you that this 'playing the victim' & discrediting critics before they have even raised the criticism, is just classic,
classic abuser behaviour. - again making no accusations but just saying.
And that the vice chair of the CMRC is doing this study, along with the hideous MAGENTA, & the Chair himself is condoning & promoting it.... NOT OK AT ALL.
Prof Holgate condoning this continuous defamation of anyone who critiques the study as harrassers/hostile/etc. I'm sorry Prof Holgate but it's disgusting & I am grossly disappointed in you. We have been harmed by this agenda & allowing your colleagues to say these things without challenge is inexcusable.
With all that i've seen about the way the CMRC set up (tymes trust emails release etc) & now this.... while i appreciate that it may have great people also involved, people who genuinely want to help patients (& i thank God that Dr S is on the board to try & at least have some kind of voice speaking reality to them), it seems to me certain that the while the CMRC is headed by people who promote such flawed ideologies, & their policies simply reinforce the hubris of those who are so convinced they are right they are unable to even
hear legitimate criticism as anything other than hostility, then anything coming out of the CMRC must be viewed with extreme suspicion.
So now I feel a very strong urge to sign OMEGA & more besides
However, ime experience in dealing with and advising people who are trying to escape/break the hold of abusers as mentioned above... The winning strategy when the abuser has defamed you as hysterical/not right in the head etc etc, and predicted your criticism & anger (& thus discredited it)... it only GIVES the abuser more power when the victims give in to getting angry & showing it. It makes them look right & plays into their hands.
So i very much hope that any criticism of fitnet will be polite & respectful, despite the fact that they imo deserve no respect whatsoever after this.
<it's taken me 2hrs to write this so apologies if it cross posts with anyone>