G
Gerwyn
Guest
XMRV was discovered in prostate cancer tumors, not by the human genome project, which would only have discovered universal retroviruses inserted into all our genomes and vertically inherited, Gerwyn. There may well be other retroviruses lurking that haven't yet been identified that are communicable in some small portion of the population.
Save this post, Gerwyn. Talk to you in a year or ten. Clearly you're not interested in evidence-based medicine, but clearly some of us are.
If mods want to move this somewhere else go ahead but Lisa's point was radical mold avoidance allowed her to tolerate antivirals she couldn't before. Since some folks are jumping on the idea of taking HAART therapy for XMRV...and one on this board couldn't tolerate the HAART therapy even though it helped her...maybe it's relevant. I think it is.
But this is just why I don't post anymore. Snide, combative, snippy, angry, biased answers (like yours).
So I will go back to backchannel, where I try to learn and help.
Thanks again, Lisa.
Hope you're doing well, Danny.
I am interested in evidence based medicine your comments were not evidenced based in any way.i merely pointed that out.i struggle how you interpret that to be snide.you are wrong XMRV was initially discovered as a result of the human genome project.They found a sequence that they could not account for.HAART therapy is very likely to prove fatal for patients with ME. 30% ofpatients without mitochondrial damage sufferserious irepairable damage after three years.That is evidence based medicine.Mold sensitive genes is not!