slayadragon
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,122
- Location
- twitpic.com/photos/SlayaDragon
I was having a discussion on another forum with a patient of Dr. Cheney's, and a couple of people suggested I post an edited version here.
*
Even if XMRV is the root cause for all of us (which Cheney now seems to think) doesn't mean that treating it directly is the way to go.
Clearly something (maybe XMRV) is making our bodies unable to eliminate all kinds of toxins. Maybe through P450 (as he suggested to you), maybe some other ways too.
Clearly mold is extremely common in our environments, especially compared to other toxins.
Clearly when the body doesn't eliminate mold, the effects of the mold on our systems are worse.
Clearly mold has a number of strong negative effects on the body that are applicable to this disease, including the creation of oxidative stress, the decrease of reduced glutathione, perforations in the BBB, and destruction of intestinal cells.
Clearly mold also has big effects on the immune system, including Natural Killer Cell function. (That’s a big defect in this illness and a primary reason why we have such bad herpes family virus problems.)
Clearly all those things above are "control points" (as Cheney puts it) that not only cause “downstream” problems but that cause the viruses that we have to flourish.
Nothing ever is going to get rid of XMRV, I think. All we’re ever going to be able to do is to keep it and the other bugs we have from getting out of control.
Cheney's whole approach (even with the XMRV discovery) is to address various "control points" in order to improve the general system and get the viral activity to go down. He's not using antiviral drugs at all, or at least not yet. It's all indirect. He thinks of artesunate as an antiviral treatment, for instance. It's my impression that he thinks of working on the gut as an antiviral treatment.
So according to this logic, mold avoidance also is an antiviral treatment. And considering the fact that the mold is, as far as I can tell, the only reasonable explanation (other than certain pathogens like viruses and Lyme) for all the oxidative stress that we're getting, eliminating it to the extent that we can is a good foundation for anything else we try to do.
None of these points are arguable. They're just complex. But Cheney is a complex thinker, and the other people working in this field are (by and large) not stupid either. It's just a matter of helping them see it.
One issue that I’m seeing is that as soon as people fasten on the idea of a virus as “the cause” (or a cause) of CFS, they immediately jump to the conclusion that drugs to kill the virus are the solution. That may turn out to be the way to go, but then again it may not be.
I have no moral objection to drugs. Lamictal has been hugely helpful to me for the past decade (though with the mold avoidance, I've now cut down on the dose without backlash). The Valcyte/Famvir have been essential in the gains I've made recently. I never would have made nearly as much detox progress without the cholestyramine.
But I think that the drugs have to be looked at as part of the whole picture. Part of it is that some people can't take drugs, and part of it is that optimal drugs to treat this virus have (at least according to the researcher working on the virus) not been developed yet.
But it's also that even if the virus is at the bottom of the whole thing and we wouldn't be sick at all if we didn't have it doesn't mean we can get back to pre-illness just by addressing it. It's not just the genetic changes, it's the fact that our bodies (as Cheney suggests) have fallen behind in doing the things that they need to in order to run optimally. Even a normally functioning system without XMRV (or a “re-stemmed” one) would have a hard time getting rid of the garbage that has accumulated and doing backlogged “repair work.” So giving our bodies as much support as we can on our way to healing, using whatever tools we have, seems to me a good idea.
What amazes me is just how much we actually know about this disease. There are some really good and committed people working on it. The kind of person attracted to this disease tends to be a "new ideas" type of person, and that has really allowed a lot of progress to be made. But everybody's now defending their own little piece. They're all in their own little cubbyholes.
I think the pieces are there to work with though. I wouldn't be making this much progress otherwise. It’s not just the mold, in my case. But I never would have gotten anywhere without addressing the mold first.
And since I've yet to see anyone with confirmed CFS who's been sick for more than two years get anywhere close to being well (meaning as well as Erik or Jonathan or I am) by ANY methods as those of us who have pursued Erik's approach suggests that this is an important piece of the puzzle. (And this includes both Mike Dessin and StormySkye, who both acknowledge that they were following this mold avoidance approach, even if rather inadvertently and without knowing exactly what they were avoiding, as they also did other things.)
I'm not saying that mold is the answer, by any means. I just am saying that leaving it out may not be prudent.
Hopefully if doctors start to understand this, they can factor the mold into the other things that they’re doing and, perhaps, see better results.
Best, Lisa
*
Even if XMRV is the root cause for all of us (which Cheney now seems to think) doesn't mean that treating it directly is the way to go.
Clearly something (maybe XMRV) is making our bodies unable to eliminate all kinds of toxins. Maybe through P450 (as he suggested to you), maybe some other ways too.
Clearly mold is extremely common in our environments, especially compared to other toxins.
Clearly when the body doesn't eliminate mold, the effects of the mold on our systems are worse.
Clearly mold has a number of strong negative effects on the body that are applicable to this disease, including the creation of oxidative stress, the decrease of reduced glutathione, perforations in the BBB, and destruction of intestinal cells.
Clearly mold also has big effects on the immune system, including Natural Killer Cell function. (That’s a big defect in this illness and a primary reason why we have such bad herpes family virus problems.)
Clearly all those things above are "control points" (as Cheney puts it) that not only cause “downstream” problems but that cause the viruses that we have to flourish.
Nothing ever is going to get rid of XMRV, I think. All we’re ever going to be able to do is to keep it and the other bugs we have from getting out of control.
Cheney's whole approach (even with the XMRV discovery) is to address various "control points" in order to improve the general system and get the viral activity to go down. He's not using antiviral drugs at all, or at least not yet. It's all indirect. He thinks of artesunate as an antiviral treatment, for instance. It's my impression that he thinks of working on the gut as an antiviral treatment.
So according to this logic, mold avoidance also is an antiviral treatment. And considering the fact that the mold is, as far as I can tell, the only reasonable explanation (other than certain pathogens like viruses and Lyme) for all the oxidative stress that we're getting, eliminating it to the extent that we can is a good foundation for anything else we try to do.
None of these points are arguable. They're just complex. But Cheney is a complex thinker, and the other people working in this field are (by and large) not stupid either. It's just a matter of helping them see it.
One issue that I’m seeing is that as soon as people fasten on the idea of a virus as “the cause” (or a cause) of CFS, they immediately jump to the conclusion that drugs to kill the virus are the solution. That may turn out to be the way to go, but then again it may not be.
I have no moral objection to drugs. Lamictal has been hugely helpful to me for the past decade (though with the mold avoidance, I've now cut down on the dose without backlash). The Valcyte/Famvir have been essential in the gains I've made recently. I never would have made nearly as much detox progress without the cholestyramine.
But I think that the drugs have to be looked at as part of the whole picture. Part of it is that some people can't take drugs, and part of it is that optimal drugs to treat this virus have (at least according to the researcher working on the virus) not been developed yet.
But it's also that even if the virus is at the bottom of the whole thing and we wouldn't be sick at all if we didn't have it doesn't mean we can get back to pre-illness just by addressing it. It's not just the genetic changes, it's the fact that our bodies (as Cheney suggests) have fallen behind in doing the things that they need to in order to run optimally. Even a normally functioning system without XMRV (or a “re-stemmed” one) would have a hard time getting rid of the garbage that has accumulated and doing backlogged “repair work.” So giving our bodies as much support as we can on our way to healing, using whatever tools we have, seems to me a good idea.
What amazes me is just how much we actually know about this disease. There are some really good and committed people working on it. The kind of person attracted to this disease tends to be a "new ideas" type of person, and that has really allowed a lot of progress to be made. But everybody's now defending their own little piece. They're all in their own little cubbyholes.
I think the pieces are there to work with though. I wouldn't be making this much progress otherwise. It’s not just the mold, in my case. But I never would have gotten anywhere without addressing the mold first.
And since I've yet to see anyone with confirmed CFS who's been sick for more than two years get anywhere close to being well (meaning as well as Erik or Jonathan or I am) by ANY methods as those of us who have pursued Erik's approach suggests that this is an important piece of the puzzle. (And this includes both Mike Dessin and StormySkye, who both acknowledge that they were following this mold avoidance approach, even if rather inadvertently and without knowing exactly what they were avoiding, as they also did other things.)
I'm not saying that mold is the answer, by any means. I just am saying that leaving it out may not be prudent.
Hopefully if doctors start to understand this, they can factor the mold into the other things that they’re doing and, perhaps, see better results.
Best, Lisa