beaverfury
beaverfury
- Messages
- 503
- Location
- West Australia
It's important not to conflate the 'alternative Lyme' testing and treatment with all Lyme testing and treatment. We do have good evidence showing what a serious diseaseLyme is, and evidence which supports the use of some testing and treatment for it.
It is important to use the best available testing - that which has supporting evidence showing it's validity, reliability and specificity, at her than alternative testing which has no evidence of value.
I can agree with all of this.
I think it's also important to differentiate between the sensitivity of two tiered Elisa/immunoblot testing in early and late stage lyme.
The sensitivity of testing in the early weeks of illness is quite pathetic, but often reaches 100% in later stage lyme with arthritic symptoms,which can only take a matter of months.
With the complexity of reading and interpreting the IgG and IgM responses beyond the average patient (me), the quality of your diagnosis and treatment will in large part depend on the quality of your physcian.
There are at least some loosely established guidelines in reading these IgG, IgM bands.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18532885
http://jcm.asm.org/content/33/2/419.long
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07853890500431934
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/47/2/188
As to the effectiveness of newer tests i have no idea. They may turn out to be more accurate than Elisa/Immunoblot.
They are not 'alternative' in the batik tie-dyed, incense burning sense. They have science behind them.
But as Esther rightly points out, they do not yet have the validity of evidence that the Elisa/Western immunoblot testing has.
C6 peptide Elisa
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01041.x/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23592827
Oxoid-IDEIA
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24072766
N.B My opinions on borrelia testing are formed by googling.