Lightning Process to be Evaluated in Research Study on Children

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
The same rules apply, of course, to vulnerable adults. Given the very poor health and cognitive difficulties of some sufferers could they be classified as vulnerable?

I agree, I think a case could be made for sick adults with cognitive impairment to be classified as "vulnerable adults". I don't know, however, whether an individual would need to be identified as such by a medical/mental health/allied professional.
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
From the Lightning Process website:

We are very pleased to announce that a Lightning Process Centre has recently opened, run by Licensed Practitioner, Berit Frivold, in the USA.

You can contact Berit at11781 Nelson Street
Loma Linda
California
CA 92354
USATel no. (909) 844 3706For further information you can contact Berit via email info@beritfrivold.com or visit her website www.living-a-life-you-love.com

April "Dr Frivold" blog article on PR:

http://www.forums.aboutmecfs.org/blog.php?b=364#comments
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
My MP, Annette Brooke (now Vice-Chair of reformed APPG on ME) has served on a number of parliamentary committees involved in children's issues.

She is a member of the

Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Public Bill Committee

(Public Bill Committees formerly known as Standing Committees)

I shall be discussing the LP pilot issue with her next week.


The work for us:

offices held in the past

Shadow Children's Minister (8 Jan 2009 to 11 May 2010)
Member, Children, Schools and Families Committee (7 Nov 2007 to 11 May 2010)
Shadow Minister (Children, Young People and Families), Children, Schools and Families (5 Jul 2007 to 8 Jan 2009)
Member, Public Accounts Committee (26 Apr 2006 to 29 Jan 2008)
Children & the Family, Cross-Portfolio and Non-Portfolio Responsibilities (21 Mar 2006 to 6 Jul 2007)
Member, Procedure Committee (14 Jul 2005 to 4 May 2006)
Shadow Minister, Education & Skills (1 Jun 2005 to 21 Mar 2006)
Member, Public Administration Committee (to 11 Apr 2005)
Other Whip (26 Jan 2004 to 1 Jun 2005)
Home Affairs Spokesperson, Home Affairs (26 Jan 2004 to 1 Jun 2005)

------

Public Bill Committees (sittings attended)
Children, Schools and Families Bill Committee (12 out of n/a)
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill Committee (17 out of n/a)
Autism Bill Committee (2 out of n/a)
Crown Employment (Nationality) Bill Committee (0 out of n/a)
Special Educational Needs (Information) Bill Committee (1 out of n/a)
Children and Young Persons Bill Committee (7 out of n/a)
Crown Employment (Nationality) Bill Committee (0 out of n/a)
Education and Inspections Bill Committee (20 out of n/a)
Childcare Bill Committee (9 out of n/a)
Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill Committee (4 out of n/a)
Children and Adoption Bill Committee (4 out of n/a)
Children Bill Committee (7 out of n/a)
Anti-social Behaviour Bill Committee (12 out of n/a)
Sexual Offences Bill Committee (10 out of n/a)
European Parliamentary and Local Elections (Pilots) Bill Committee (5 out of n/a)
Proceeds of Crime Bill Committee (21 out of n/a)
Police Reform Bill Committee (10 out of n/a)
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
NHS consultant in pain medicine Lightning Process testimonials

Here's one convinced NHS consultant in pain medicine giving testimonials on the site of The Rowan Centre, Lightning Process, Suffolk, along with that wretched Rantzen woman:

http://www.simpsonandfawdry.com/about-simpson-and-fawdry.htm

There's a testimonial on the home page from

Professor Rajesh Munglani. MB BS DCH DA FRCA FFPMRCA. Consultant in pain medicine.
West Suffolk Hospital and Nuffield Health Cambridge Hospital.


"I have been very impressed with the results of the LP. I have seen the lives of some of my patients transformed by this self empowering technique. Everyone who has battled with chronic illness and wants to win should have an opportunity to do the Lightning Process."


and also on this page:

http://www.simpsonandfawdry.com/lightning-process.html

"There are now NHS and private consultants, GPs and occupational therapists referring their patients to us at the Rowan Centre. Clinicians in the NHS have attended the full programme to observe the work we do.

To find out more, you can speak to Gael Postle, Occupational Therapist at the James Paget University Hospital pain clinic on 01493 453307 or, the OTs at the Norfolk and Suffolk ME/CFS service on 01502 527579.


"I have been very impressed with the results of the LP. I have seen the lives of some of my patients transformed by this self empowering technique. Everyone who has battled with chronic illness and wants to win should have an opportunity to do the Lightning Process."

Professor Rajesh Munglani. MB BS DCH DA FRCA FFPMRCA. Consultant in pain medicine.
West Suffolk Hospital and Nuffield Health Cambridge Hospital.



Professor Munglani has also promoted the Lightning Process in this 8 March 2010 BMJ Rapid Response:

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/340/jan06_2/b5683

Failure to appreciate pain is a symptom not a diagnosis is what leads to bad medicine 8 March 2010

Rajesh Munglani,
Consultant in Pain Medicine
West Suffolk Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital Trust.Bury St Edmunds IP33 2QZ


Send response to journal:
Re: Failure to appreciate pain is a symptom not a diagnosis is what leads to bad medicine

[...]

"It was pleasing to note that the Chief Medical Officer recognised the valuable role all health professionals but specifically the critical role pain clinics play treating such patients but, we are quite frankly utterly under resourced (xxvii).

"In our pain clinic we recognise that the causes of pain needs to be diagnosed, opioids are only one tool in our box of tricks. Non pharmcological techniques including diagnostic and therapeutic spinal radiofrequency injections can produced long lasting improvement in pain scores and quality of life sadly these techniques have been rather unfairly dismissed by NICE in their new early low back pain guidelines despite strong evidence for a moderate a to good outcome (xxviii). Psychological approaches including Nurse run patient seminars, counselling, CBT and indeed NLP, and pain management programmes(xxix)and other more recent techniques such as the Lightening [sic] Process (xxx) and the Expert Patient Progamme may make a profound difference to patients life."


I've been wondering when the Lighting Process might start making inroads into medical conditions beyond ME, CFS and MS:

Here on the Rowan Centre site, it's being peddled for a whole bunch of medical conditions:

http://www.simpsonandfawdry.com/lightning-process.html

[...]

What does the Lightning Process work for ?

"People using the Lightning Process have recovered from, or experienced significant improvement with the following issues and conditions

"ME, chronic fatigue syndrome, PVFS, adrenal fatigue
acute and chronic pain, back pain, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, migraine, injury
PMT, perimenopausal symptoms and menopause
clinical depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety and panic attacks, OCD and PTSD
low self-esteem, confidence issues
hay fever, asthma and allergies
candida, interstitial cystitis, urinary infections, bladder and bowel problems
IBS, coeliac disease, crohns disease, food intolerances and allergies
blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmia, type 2 diabetes, restless leg syndrome, hyper / hypo thyroidism
insomnia and sleep disorders
autistic spectrum disorder, dyspraxia, ADHD
lymes disease, glandular fever, epstein barr virus
weight and food issues, anorexia and eating disorders
multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, parkinsonian tremor, motor neurone disease"
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
The Rowan Centre fees:
http://www.simpsonandfawdry.com/employers.htm

Fees

The fee to a private individual is 780. The cost to employers is 1,500 per person (we keep the fee to individuals low because they are often not working and unable to afford it easily, whereas an employer will benefit financially from investing in their employee).

The fee includes any pre-coaching and preparation required, assessment, 3 full days training, course materials, support CD and 3 half hour follow up coaching sessions. Additional coaching is available at 50 per half hour. It is worth budgeting for as some clients may need more follow up than others.

We also offer a free online support forum.

Referrals

NHS and Private


We receive referrals from many GPs and leading private and NHS consultants, as well as The James Padget Norfolk and Suffolk ME/CFS service and the Pain clinic . One of these is Professor Rajesh Munglani, consultant in pain medicine, West Suffolk Hospital in Bury St Edmunds.

"I have been very impressed with the results of the LP. I have seen the lives of some of my patients transformed by this self empowering technique. Everyone who has battled with chronic illness and wants to win should have an opportunity to do the Lightning Process."

Professor Rajesh Munglani. MB BS DCH DA FRCA FFPMRCA. Consultant in pain medicine. West Suffolk Hospital and Nuffield Health Cambridge Hospital. (picture: Dr Munglani)

Corporate
Organisations currently referring their clients to the Lightning Process training programme are Legal & General, the Metropolitan Police, Pioneer and the Shaw Trust.
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
ME Association position statement on LP (from early 2007)

This position statement was issued by the MEA in early 2007:

http://www.meassociation.org.uk/ind...he-lightning-process&catid=30:news&Itemid=161

MEA's position on the Lightning Process

Tuesday, 06 February 2007

Dozens of people have used this site's search tool to find out more about the "Lightning Process", which was featured in the Daily Mail on February 6 and in other large articles this month in the regional press.

The ME Association's position on the subject is as follows:

Whlle we are always pleased to hear of people recovering from ME/CFS, what may work for one person may not work for another.

The Lightning Process is a new and very speculative form of treatment that has not been assessed in a proper clinical trial. So while we are providing information about it, it is not a form of treatment that we are able to endorse. We recommend caution when considering this approach.

We welcome feedback from anyone who has used the Lightning Process.

As ever, The ME Association remains committed to pursuing the funding of research into the physical nature and causes of ME - believing that this is the way to discover a reliable diagnostic test and, ultimately, the real cure.

[Ends]



The Lightning Process is a new and very speculative form of treatment that has not been assessed in a proper clinical trial. So while we are providing information about it, it is not a form of treatment that we are able to endorse. We recommend caution when considering this approach.

But the MEA is silent on the issue of this pilot study in children 8 to 18.
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
Poll on ME agenda

New Poll on ME agenda

Shortlink: http://wp.me/p5foE-2W3 or http://tinyurl.com/LightningProcessPilotStudyPoll


For background to this issue:

Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) Adjudication: Withinspiration (Lightning Process)

Poll: Is it ethical to undertake a pilot study looking at the feasibility of recruiting children aged 8 to 18 with CFS and ME into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing Lightning Process and specialist medical care when no rigorous RCTs into the application of LP in adults have been undertaken?

Go here to vote
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
Is there an Ombudsman for children in the U.K? Anything to challenge this appalling travesty.


Hi paddygirl,

Yes, there is a Children's Commissioner -

The Children's Commissioner for England is Maggie Atkinson.

"The role of the Children's Commissioner was created by the Children Act 2004 and is there to promote the views of children and young people from birth to 18 (up to 21 for young people in care or with learning difficulties)."

Children Act 2004 at: http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/additional_promos/content_15

or in PDF format here: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/pdf/ukpga_20040031_en.pdf

(I have not had time to read through the Act, yet.)

I may be wrong, but from the site, it looks as though this is for the use of children themselves and presumably, adults acting as an advocate for a child and or young person up the the age of 21 (which does not apply to me).

Recent reports that this Commissioner post could be axed:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ens-Commissioner-post-value-money-review.html

Government could axe 138,000-a-year Children's Commissioner post in 'value for money' review

By Laura Clark
Last updated at 6:01 PM on 12th July 2010

and

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...missioner-could-be-scrapped-after-review.html


There is also Every Child Matters:

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/safeguardingandsocialcare/

with a wide remit which includes:

Safeguarding and social care

On Monday, I sent a comphensive email of concerns plus attachments to my MP, Annette Brooke, who is now Acting Vice-Chair of the reformed APPG on ME requesting her involvement and suggestions for any avenues that might be worth pursuing. She has sat on a number of standing committees (now known as Public Bill Committees) for children's issues, and also the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Public Bill Committee.

I am requesting a review of the decision to withhold virtually all information on this pilot and also have another separate FOI to submit, in the next few days.

I submitted a "Rapid Response" to the BMJ site, last night, and should know by the end of today whether it has been accepted for publication. If it is not published, I shall send a copy to our ME charities, anyway, and will also post a copy here.

Suzy
 

paddygirl

Senior Member
Messages
163
Suzy, my hat is off to you. It's people like yourself that will take the lid off and expose this ugly mess.

Paddy
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
Transcript of Dr Esther Crawley / Professor S Wessely

A bit Off Topic


http://feeds.bmj.com/~r/bmjlearning...ue_syndrome_ME_an_update_for_primary_care.mp3


Transcript of Dr Esther Crawley / Professor S Wessely
BMJ learning Audio Module


Morant: Hello I'm Dr Helen Morant a clinical editor at BMJ learning. Welcome to this audio module on chronic fatigue syndrome recorded in March 2010. Chronic fatigue syndrome or ME has been a prominent topic in the medical press recently. We asked some experts in the field to talk to us about the GP's role in helping patient with the condition.

Dr Esther Crawley is a consultant senior lecturer at the University of Bristol and a paediatrician with a special interest in CFS/ME. Shes currently the Chair of the British association CFS/ME and was on the guideline development group for the most recent NICE guidelines. Professor Simon Wessely is chair of the department of psychological medicine at King's College London and he has helped to establish and now works in the first NHS unit specialising in CFS/ME

First, Esther Crawley explains what chronic fatigue syndrome actually is.

Crawley: Chronic fatigue syndrome is also called a lot of other names such as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis or myalgic encephalopathy (sic). Its defined by the National institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) as disabling fatigue without another cause. In adults, the disabling fatigue must last at least four months or must have been present for 4 months and in children its three months. There are a variety of symptoms which are usually present. NICE suggests that at least one symptom must be present before a GP can make a diagnosis. The symptoms include problems with memory and concentration, unrefreshing sleep, headaches, nausea, muscle aches and pains joint aches and so on.

Simon Wessely: It is a controversial and rather difficult area of medicine, its certainly not new and it is defined on symptoms alone, on the history alone, where you have a characteristic pattern of someone with severe physical fatigue and fatigability, in other words its not just that they feel, you know, very tired all the time but physical effort makes them worse and quite considerably so and they also have mental fatigue and mental fatigability. So mental fatigue also leaves them in a state of exhaustion and they have other symptoms as well such as muscle pain, mood change, sleep disturbance, they often gain weight and various other symptoms. So its defined on symptoms alone which always makes it a difficult category for medicine along with many other similar disorders.

Crawley: I think its important that GPs explain to patients about the different names that the illness can be called. Some patients will come with a preference to use one name as opposed to another. On the whole it seems to make sense when youre discussing patients or referring patients onto services to use the name adopted by the NHS and that is chronic fatigue syndrome/ME which is a name that has been derived by committee. Patient groups and patients tend to prefer ME and doctors tend to prefer chronic fatigue syndrome. Weve agreed collaboratively to use both in the diagnostic label CFS/ME. Other names that doctors sometimes use and I find unhelpful or can be unhelpful are names such as glandular fever or post viral fatigue and so on and I think sometimes the different types of names add confusion to patients.

Morant: So How prevalent is this disease?

Wessely:
It all comes down to definition. Weve been doing epidemiological studies over the years and if you use a broad definition which includes, for example, also people who have co-morbid concurrent, depression, anxiety - its maybe up to 1 or 2 % of the population. If you go for a narrow definition. it comes down to about 0.2 / 0.3% - so its a bit like blood pressure, it all depends on where you draw the line - but the one thing we can say that this is certainly a definable illness in the population and it does present a not inconsiderable burden in general practice, primary care and also in medical services.

Crawley:
Chronic fatigue is actually a very serious condition. Its not only more common than we previously thought but is probably one of the largest loss of earnings in the United States and probably therefore this country as well and is certainly thought to be the largest cause of long-term school absence.

In fact in children, probably one third of children dont end up with qualifications after a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome and on average they miss a year of school. All the evidence suggests supporting children and adults with this condition, enabling them to have access to specialist services and getting an early diagnosis is only gonna (sic) help them not only in terms of getting better from this illness but also in terms of preventing secondary consequences of long term debilitating illness. So Id encourage GPs to make a diagnosis quickly and refer quickly onto specialist services.


Morant:
What do we know about why certain individuals are more likely to suffer from CFS/ME than others.

Crawley: Theres lots of evidence that chronic fatigue syndrome is genetically heritable but is usually triggered by an environmental factor and for children the environmental factor is usually infection. In adults it often is an infection as well. One of the most common infections that we all know about is the Epstein Barr Virus but other infections seem to be particularly important. In this country it certainly might be streptococcal infections and so on.

Morant: So how should GPs respond when confronted with a patient presenting with CFS or ME type symptoms?


Crawley:
Its really important to exclude other causes, so one of the things that GPs need to do when they see someone who they suspect might have chronic fatigue syndrome is to exclude other causes of fatigue and theres a set of screening bloods that GPs need to think about doing and they will send these to try and exclude psychological causes of fatigue.

The investigations are listed in the NICE guidelines and include full blood count, ESR, CRP, CPK, celiac screen Ferritin in children U +Es, LFTs and a urine dipstick, as well as calcium and phosphate brain function.

Morant:
There has been a lot of controversy about CFS/ME and Esther Crawley is keen to counteract some common misconceptions.

Crawley: There are several myths that are really, you know, have been discredited now, for example one of the myths was that it did not exist in primary school age children. Theres lots of evidence that it quite often starts in children particularly those over the age of seven and eight. Another myth is that it doesnt exist in old people but now there is increasing evidence that it does.

There is the myth that this is an illness of upper class white Caucasians but in fact the reverse is true.

Morant: Simon Wessely explains that CFS/ME has specific indicators which can help guide diagnosis.

Wessely: You also have to look for things that arent quite right in the clinical history. Weight Loss, weight loss is not common in people with chronic fatigue syndrome at all. Most people - their weight is steady or they gain weight. We dont like weight loss. We will request usually a second opinion from a physician - and then people who have isolated symptoms for example who have fatigue and muscle pain but only after exercise and who do not have it at rest and have no mental fatigue. We like them to see a neurologist. So anything that doesnt fit the pattern and as I emphasise again, the core pattern here is intense physical and mental fatigue and physical and mental fatigability. So, not fitting the pattern we dont like - history of foreign travel we dont like - physical signs, definitely has to be investigated because there will be an alternative diagnosis. So, lets get that straight but having said, that in the majority of cases thats not going to be found and we will be left with people who do fulfil the criteria.

The next thing we would like is for the GP to give a good, confident diagnosis. Once the GP is sure this is not, you know, an unusual presentation of a lymphoma or early colon cancer or endocrine disorder lets give a clear and confident diagnosis, say yep, this is what it is - this is chronic fatigue syndrome or ME, this is what youve got. Its not uncommon, its a genuine illness, we recognise it, lets not get into the battle of diagnosis that sometimes happens. Lets not get into, oh does it exist - doesnt exist. It exists. Period. And patients need to have a good strong message theyve got something wrong with them and now having established that now lets move onto the next step.

Morant: Ester Crawley discusses what should happen after a positive diagnosis.

Crawley: Well, the NICE guide lines which were published in August 2007 detailed what should be done at every stage after screening investigations had been done there are set of things that GPs can offer patients in terms of looking at what they do each day and their sleep and so on. If patients dont get better then they should be offered access to services and that should be offered immediately if a patient is severely affected and after 3 months if theyre moderately affected, and moderately affected means not able to work full time but able to do their self care. At 6 months, if they're mildly affected ie able to work full time but not able to do social stuff. By referring to specialist services what a GP is then doing should be offering a variety of treatment that is available in specialist services and they are all detailed in the NICE guidance. And there is a variety of things you can do for patients including activity management, CBT, graded exercise and individualised treatment programmes that use components from each of those options.

Morant: The protocol is slightly different when it comes to children.

Crawley:
If a GP sees a child with fatigue it is very important and the NICE guidelines say this that they are referred immediately to a paediatrician and this is to insure that other causes of fatigue are excluded, such as leukaemia - arthritis and also congenital causes of fatigue. Once other causes of fatigue have been excluded and a diagnosis of chronic fatigue is made, the GP is often pivotal in helping the child manage their condition by liaison with other agencies such as schools as well as health services and insuring that the child gets access to specialised chronic fatigue care.

Morant:
Simon Wessely describes the importance of careful management of the condition.

Wessely: Treatment, very similar in large areas of medicine is about rehabilitation, its about, O.K., this has happened to you, youve been handed a particular hand of cards. Lets have a look at how you play it because there are good and bad ways of managing this illness. Now we start to look at all the secondary effects that have happened to you and a lot of people with CFS have got depressed, no question about it, and I dont mind, you know, that may upset people, but thats just simply true. We also know that there are a lot of people who've had depression are more at risk of developing CFS. So if people have got depression lets not ignore it - were gonna treat that. Some people got themselves into very unhelpful patterns of activity and you know, their activity management isnt very good - they do too much, get exhausted then they do too little to recover and thats not a very satisfactory way. Were gonna look at sleep hygiene can we improve sleep? Were gonna look at pain control were gonna look at this whole balance of rest, activity, sleep, energy and exercise. Were gonna look to make things predictable and so that theyre consistent over a period of time and then we are gradually going to look to steadily increase that over a period of what may well be weeks, more likely many months.

All the time were doing this by saying look we dont really know why you got ill. We dont know! Were not going to lie you down on the couch and talk about your mother because its entirely irrelevant we're not going to do more and more tests well what was the virus, because frankly, even if we found it theres nothing were going to do about it. Were in the business of rehabilitation. Its an approach that works and its an approach that works in many analogous conditions particularly for example chronic pain syndromes that are rather similar. It's about improving control of illness - its about improving management its about improving quality of life improving the control of symptoms and many people, and again Im quoting studies here, will do very well on this approach.

Morant: What about outcomes for patients suffering the condition?

Wessely: Around 30% of people seem to get completely better and again results vary in some services 20%, 25% it's of that order. So the majority of people dont get cured but some do.

The next big chunk, maybe another 30% improve in particular their quality of life improves, their control over their illness improves, very, very important - but they still have symptoms and they're not how they were. Another third of people, it doesnt really seem to make much difference.

Morant: Esther Crawley stresses the role of the GP is vital in managing this condition

Crawley: When GPs see patients frequently its an ideal opportunity for a GP to develop a relationship with a patient and help the patient implement an individualised rehab programmes. If a GP feels unable to start that process off then they should refer to a specialist service but once a patient is seen by a specialist service, they should have a detailed rehabilitation plan that is monitored by the specialist service and the GP can work with the specialist service to help that monitoring and that monitoring will include a variety of strategies to look at activities, goal setting and sleep and should be done with the patient, aiming for the patient to be managing their own condition.

Wessely:
What we know from the studies is for people to get better they dont have to change their views of what's wrong with them - we dont have to get into these Cartesian battles that no-one ends up a winner. What we do need to look at is how they use rest, exercise, sleep and so on and how they manage symptoms, in other words the "down the line" consequences. When those change, the research shows people start to get better.

Morant: Thanks to Esther Crawley and Professor Simon Wessely. You can find links to the NICE guidelines for chronic fatigue syndrome or ME and many other useful resources at the end of this learning module. Thanks for listening and join us again soon for another BMJ learning module.

----------

Dr Esther Crawley is....

Dr Crawley, FRCPCH, PhD, is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Bristol, a Consultant Paediatrician and clinical lead for the Bath CFS service. Dr Crawleys specialist CFS service for children and adolescents is reported to be the largest regional paediatric service in the UK and also provides services nationally.

Dr Crawley had been a member of the NICE CFS/ME Guideline Development Group and gives presentations around the NICE guideline CG53 and the CFS/ME Clinical and Research Network.

Dr Crawley had chaired the CFS/ME Clinical Research Network Collaborative (CCRNC), now reformed under the new name BACME, for which Dr Crawley continues as chair.

Dr Crawley is a member of the MRCs CFS/ME Expert Panel.

In the last couple of years, Dr Crawleys research team has been awarded considerable sums of funding for CFS studies and Chronic Fatigue studies in children including a 873,579 NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship award, last year.

She has also received funding from patient organisation, Action for M.E. (49,650).

Grants awarded to Dr Crawley during 2007-09 here: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/ccah/grants/

------------------

Radio 4 Case Notes: Dr Crawley on her CFS clinic's approach, November 2007
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/casenotes_tr_20071106.shtml

----------------

Dr Crawley is the Medical Consultant to AYME - the children's ME and CFS org.

Sir Peter Spencer, CEO of Bristol based, Action for M.E., is a non-executive director of the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath Dr Esther Crawleys employer.

-----------------

Criticism on Facebook of Crawley's approach:

Children with CFS/ME

30 May

Peter Spearing
we have just written to Dr E Crawley as not happy with her teams approach to our daughter - everything they suggested made her worse.Also ignoring all digestion system severe problems and severe hypersensativity in Sensory Nerves ie Noise smell,light and taste and why she is sofa/bed bound 23 hours a day.Aslo ignoeing ...bladder bowel eyes and Heart symptoms.All they talk about is fatigue


[...]

Peter Spearing
No it was not Dr Crawley that diagnosed Canadian Criteria but a great independant Autonomic Nervous Specialist.We knew after 2 years of beibg so severely ill something more than fatigue condition was going on.


Different thread:

27 May

Peter Spearing
I totally agree with this our daughter has finally been diagnosed this month after 2 1/2 years of moderate - severe canadian criteria.So many other missed diagnosis are in with cfs like thyriod problems,adrenal fatigue etc.


Different thread

20 April


Peter Spearing
Hi Our daughter has had severe ME for over 2 years now 10 years old but ill with lots of viruses 11/2 years before this and medical problems from the age of 5.We were refered to Dr Esther Crawley last year.Unfortunately everything they recommeneded made our daughter worse and another major relapse this Winter.We are in the process of taking our daughter out of her clinic.We find total brain and body rest and no pressure keeps the many many many symptoms at bay.Happy to give you further info if you want it.So sorry your son is so young.

[...]


23 April

Peter Spearing
sorry to say it we dealt with one of her doctors with her advise.Everything they suggested made her worse.They ignored most the symptoms we were telling them.Our daughter started with a baseline of 21/4 hours and to could only increase by 2% a week but after 4-5 weeks relapsed/got worse and started again we tried for 5 months.We have not had any ... See Morecontact with them since last may.We find total physical and mental rest no pressure peace and quiet works.She has also had to stop all home lessons as made her so ill.If your son has true ME it will not work.The NHS do not get this illness.Our daughter has alot of neurological symptoms which are ignored.Give it a go a few very mild cases it is ok with but they wanted her to do physio and we have had private tests done and she is very exercise intolerant so told they could have damaged her heart and muscles.



Young Children with M.E/CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome)

May 29

Peter Spearing
We have now wriitten to Dr E Crawley that we want her to take Stephanie out of her care.This is due to they are ignoring and not investigating the many symptoms in her digestion system,why she is sofabound 23 hours a day and ignoring us when we tell them about Steph's severe hypersensativity to noise,light,smell and ta...ste.Also getting her to do lots of thinks that made her worse.We have taken her to an independant Autonomic neurologist and devasting results many problems with her spinal cord,brain and nervous system so have most explainations now to all her awful symptoms including mild bladder,bowels,eyes,breathing and worse in digestion,heart and sensory nerves

Discussion thread (about three months ago)


Joanne McCarthy Bazneh Hi

Just wondered if any of you have had to put your children on an activity management program & how did it go for you? (the Red, amber, green & blue )
We have been put on it by Esther Crawley... Its so so hard with a 4 year old & to be honest, i am not even sure its going to work?! I know that sounds negative, but I just cant see the improvment she is hoping for happening?
Has anyone else got any thoughts on this ir experiences?
She has also reduced his sleep... he was having 12 hours before- 6pm - 6am.,, she felt this was too much for him & we know have to put to bed later at 7 so he only gets 11 hours. She feels this will improve quality of sleep? so far..all we have had is an even more tired boy I didnt feel 12 hours was excessive for his age anyway (he's 4) but she felt it was going to bed too early?
about 3 months ago
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
Response to BMJ (not yet published)

**************************************************

Poll: Is it ethical to undertake a pilot study looking at the feasibility
of recruiting children aged 8 to 18 with CFS and ME into a randomised
controlled trial (RCT) comparing the Lightning Process and specialist
medical care when no rigorous RCTs into the application of the Lightning
Process in adults with CFS and ME have been undertaken?

Register your opinion here:


http://wp.me/p5foE-2W3 or
http://tinyurl.com/LightningProcessPilotStudyPoll

**************************************************

The following response was submitted to BMJ Rapid Responses on 15 July, and is currently unpublished.

In response to letters at: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/340/jan06_2/b5683

Re: Failure to appreciate pain is a symptom not a diagnosis is what leads
to bad medicine


Suzy Chapman
Carer
Dorset

15 July 2010


Send response to journal:
Re: Re: Failure to appreciate pain is a symptom not a diagnosis is what
leads to bad medicine



In his response "Failure to appreciate pain is a symptom not a diagnosis is what leads to bad medicine", Dr Munglani, Consultant in Pain Medicine, West Suffolk Hospital, recommends the Lightning Process [1].

The Lightning Process is a three-day course said to be based on neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and life coaching. It is marketed not as a therapy or a treatment but as a "training program". It is unregulated and its practitioners are trained and "licensed" by the Phil Parker organisation. Many of those who train to become Lightning Process instructors are former "trainees", themselves.

I note that Dr Munglani has a provided a number of personal testimonials for the pages of the website of a Suffolk Lightning Process centre [2].

The website states that there are now NHS and private consultants, GPs and occupational therapists referring patients to the centre, and that NHS clinicians have attended as observers of the work carried out there. Visitors to the site are encouraged to contact an OT at the James Paget University Hospital pain clinic or OTs at the Norfolk and Suffolk ME/CFS service, for which contact details are given.

On one of its web pages is the following:

"What does the Lightning Process work for?

"People using the Lightning Process TM have recovered from, or experienced significant improvement with the following issues and conditions

"ME, chronic fatigue syndrome, PVFS, adrenal fatigue, acute and chronic
pain, back pain, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, migraine, injury, PMT,
perimenopausal symptoms and menopause, clinical depression, bipolar
disorder, anxiety and panic attacks, OCD and PTSD, low self- esteem,
confidence issues, hay fever, asthma and allergies, candida, interstitial
cystitis, urinary infections, bladder and bowel problems, IBS, coeliac
disease, crohns disease, food intolerances and allergies, blood pressure,
cardiac arrhythmia, type 2 diabetes, restless leg syndrome, hyper/hypo
thyroidism, insomnia and sleep disorders, autistic spectrum disorder,
dyspraxia, ADHD, lymes disease, glandular fever, epstein barr virus, weight
and food issues, anorexia and eating disorders, multiple sclerosis,
cerebral palsy, parkinsonian tremor, motor neurone disease"



On 16 June, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) published an adjudication against a Bournemouth company following its upholding of a complaint about a Lightning Process advertisement [3].

The ASA records their concerns that "the company did not hold robust evidence to support their claims that the lightning process was an effective treatment for CFS or ME. We therefore reminded them of their obligations under the CAP Code to hold appropriate evidence to substantiate claims prior to publication. Because we had not seen any evidence to demonstrate the efficacy of the lightning process for treating the advertised conditions, we concluded that the claims had not been proven and were therefore misleading."

The company was advised to ensure "they held substantiation before making similar efficacy claims for the lightning process".

The Advertising Standards Authority's remit does not extend to website content. But I hope that Dr Munglani, who provides personal testimonials for the Suffolk centre, has satisfied himself that this centre is able to provide robust evidence to substantiate its claims that people using the Lightning Process, said to be based on neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and life coaching, have "recovered from, or experienced significant improvement" from diseases and conditions which, in addition to ME and chronic fatigue syndrome, include urinary infections, coeliac disease, crohns disease, blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmia, type 2 diabetes, hyper/hypo thyroidism, autistic spectrum disorder, dyspraxia, ADHD, lymes disease, glandular fever, epstein barr virus, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, parkinsonian tremor and motor neurone disease.

This is a very topical issue because in March, the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases NHS Foundation Trust, also known as the Min, and the University of Bristol announced a pilot study looking into interventions and treatment options for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome [4].

Funding of 164,000 from the Linbury Trust and the Ashden Trust has been awarded to a research team led by Dr Esther Crawley, Consultant Paediatrician, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, CFS Clinical Lead for Bath NHS FT and a Senior Lecturer, University of Bristol.

The pilot study, scheduled to start in September, will look at the feasibility of recruiting children aged to 18 with CFS and ME into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the Lightning Process and specialist medical care. The study has the involvement of Phil Parker and colleagues.

"The study will involve in depth interviews with the patients and their parents, and the primary outcome measure will be school attendance after six-months. It is hoped that over 90 children aged between eight and 18 and their families will be involved in the study. They will be recruited after assessment by the specialist team at the Min."

The Medical Research Council (MRC) produces specific guidelines for research involving vulnerable patient groups. The document "MRC Medical Research Involving Children" is clear:

"4.1 Does the research need to be carried out with children? Research involving children should only be carried out if it cannot feasibly be carried out on adults." [5]

No rigorous RCTs into the application of the Lightning Process in adults with CFS and ME have been undertaken.

Data from two large patient surveys carried out by Action for M.E./AYME (published 2008) and by the ME Association (published May 2010) show similar levels of worsening of symptoms in CFS and ME patients following the three day "training program", or of no improvement at all (AfME/AYME: Worse: 16%, No change: 31%; MEA: Slightly worse 7.9%; Much worse 12.9%; No change 34.7%) [6].

With no robust data from the application of Lightning Process in adults, how can the research team determine that overall the likely benefits of the research outweigh any risks to child participants and that undergoing the training program would not be detrimental to a child's current health status and psychological well-being, as a patient diagnosed with CFS or ME?

There are considerable concerns that an NHS paediatric CFS unit should be planning a study involving children as young as eight when no rigorous trials have first been undertaken into the safety, acceptability, long and short-term effects of the application of this controversial and unregulated "process".

Not only is it feasible to carry out research into the application of the Lightning Process using adults with ME and CFS, many feel it unethical not to do so first.

References

[1] Failure to appreciate pain is a symptom not a diagnosis is what leads to bad medicine: Rajesh Munglani, 8 March 2010:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/340/jan06_2/b5683#232414

[2] The Rowan Centre, Suffolk:
http://www.simpsonandfawdry.com/about-simpson-and-fawdry.htm

[3] Advertising Standards Authority Adjudication, 16 June 2010:
http://www.asa.org.uk/Complaints-an...ions/2010/6/Withinspiration/TF_ADJ_48612.aspx

[4] Media Release, University of Bristol, 2 March 2010:
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2010/6866.html

[5] MRC Medical Research Involving Children (Nov 2004, revised Aug 2007):
http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002430

[6] Patient Survey 2008, Action for M.E. and AYME:
http://www.afme.org.uk/res/img/resources/Survey Summary Report 2008.pdf

Patient Survey May 2010, ME Association:
http://www.meassociation.org.uk/images/stories/2010_survey_report_lo-res.pdf

Competing interests: None declared

-----------------------------
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
I have contacted all the national UK patient organisations, again, today.

I have also contacted the Countess of Mar, Earl Freddie Howe (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State [Quality], Health since 14 May 2010) and Lord Clement-Jones and provided them with information and documents. (All three are Patrons to the Young ME Sufferers Trust).

This afternoon, I received a response from Neil Riley, Chair, ME Association Board of Trustees, confirming that "a statement will be issued".

Suzy
 

maryb

iherb code TAK122
Messages
3,602
Location
UK
A bit Off Topic


so far..all we have had is an even more tired boy I didnt feel 12 hours was excessive for his age anyway (he's 4) but she felt it was going to bed too early?


The interview has to be read to be believed, they still don't get it and never will, the pair are in a bubble of their own making.
This other bit made me want to cry though, they really are dangerous, stupid, cruel people, what arrogance does Crawley have to tell parents not to let a poor sick wee boy of 4 not sleep for 12 hours, how many children will sleep too much at that age if they don't need it/to.
 
Messages
77
Location
Leicestershire, England.
The ASA does not cover website content - it applies to advertisments. The "Withinspiration" adjudication resulted out of a complaint against an advert - not website content.

"Claims on websites

Although we do deal with some advertisements that appear online, the ASA does not currently have any remit over marketing messages on companies own websites. We can consider complaints about sales promotions that appear on companies websites."


Since Lightning Process is unregulated, it would be a Trading Standards issue.

Phil being a slippery eel as usual I see
Also ME Agenda sorry for not replying to your correspondence via BS, been abit brain fogged recently. :Retro smile:
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
...Also ME Agenda sorry for not replying to your correspondence via BS, been abit brain fogged recently. :Retro smile:

Not to worry, Elliot. I don't check the BS Bath/Bristol LP pilot thread very often, so if you are intending to respond, maybe best to PM me here, or via EM.

The Phil Parker org has stated to one enquirer that it is currently applying for accreditation from the British Psychological Society as part of their practitioner's CPD (Continuing Professional Development).

Suzy
 

Angela Kennedy

Senior Member
Messages
1,026
Location
Essex, UK
Not to worry, Elliot. I don't check the BS Bath/Bristol LP pilot thread very often, so if you are intending to respond, maybe best to PM me here, or via EM.

The Phil Parker org has stated to one enquirer that it is currently applying for accreditation from the British Psychological Society as part of their practitioner's CPD (Continuing Professional Development).

Suzy

Hi Suzy,

Just out of interest - I haven't been looking in at all to the BS forum in the past couple of weeks for various reasons - have they been supportive of your work on the LP issues at all?
 

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
The interview has to be read to be believed, they still don't get it and never will, the pair are in a bubble of their own making.

Their descriptions of the illness bear little relation to the illness as many of here know it.

"...we're not going to do more and more tests well what was the virus, because frankly, even if we found it there’s nothing we’re going to do about it. We’re in the business of rehabilitation..."

Interesting the figures SW then gives for recovery:

"Around 30% of people seem to get completely better and again results vary in some services 20%, 25% it's of that order. So the majority of people don’t get cured but some do.

"The next big chunk, maybe another 30% improve in particular their quality of life improves, their control over their illness improves, very, very important - but they still have symptoms and they're not how they were. Another third of people, it doesn’t really seem to make much difference."


Yet according to that KCL site Mary Burgess article (based on the work of Pauline Powell):

http://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/cfs/patients/physiology.html

"Conclusions

"As we said there is good evidence to show that all of the above effects are reversible by a programme of gradual physical rehabilitation..."



This other bit made me want to cry though, they really are dangerous, stupid, cruel people, what arrogance does Crawley have to tell parents not to let a poor sick wee boy of 4 not sleep for 12 hours, how many children will sleep too much at that age if they don't need it/to.

I know. By the age of four, most little ones will have dropped an afternoon nap and some of them will be zonked out and ready for bed quite early. If you don't put them to bed, they'll fall asleep on the sofa, or the floor. 12 hours sleep would not be excessive for a healthy four year old, especially if he's been awake from 6am.

I really dislike the concept and the term "sleep hygiene".


For the transcript of the Radio 4 Case Notes broadcast go here:

Dr Crawley on her CFS clinic's approach, November 2007
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/casenotes_tr_20071106.shtml

Suzy
 
Back