I don’t know what to think of it. Too severe to read it completely so I skimmed it. Can anybody explain:
How does that translate to PEM severe patients get from reading? How does it explain the sensitivities to sound/light etc? How does it explain the metabolic impairments?
I would love to see a research group conducting a meta study linking all the findings of the last years and exclude those who are unlikely correct…
Edit: I find this part particularly interesting:
“ If so, one would expect a greater benefit for patients with less ongoing immune activation and less vascular dysregulation, but with main symptom contributions from the secondary autonomic adaptations. Conversely, patients with active immune disturbance and ongoing vascular dysregulation as the main symptom generators would have less impact from cognitive intervention, although psychosocial support and coping strategies may still have a beneficial impact on their quality of life.”
So, a friend of mine who had severe ME for year's with POTS got out of bed solely with DNRS. If I understand them right, it's more due to controlling the parasympaticus than the limbic system (as these programs claims).
So: If s.o. for example doesn't respond to let's say Mestinon and is negative for the Scheibenbogen GPR AAb, then he*she might be a responder to these “cognitive technics”
Did I get that wrong?