Great theory paper that makes a LOT of sense to me. I suspect the overlap between orthostatic elements and ME/CFS may be more important than a mere comorbidity. Watch
@JenB's movie and see how every single ME/CFS patient sits with their legs up. Even the ones that aren't lying down have their legs up.
I'm capable of a lot, but sitting for along period with my legs down isn't something I can do.
So I appreciate the way the bloodflow issues are centred in this theory with most everything else being compensatory. It's logical. It also explains why symptoms can be anywhere in the body. Whether it's your eyes being sensitive or your gut, there's a plausible link to bloodflow.
You coul even integrate the theories of JenB and say in some patients the problem is a spine dysfunction affecting the autonomic nerves affecting the bloodflow, in others it is autoantibodies affecting bloodflow, etc.
But I note the following, which I've said before: theory is cheap to make. We all have theories. I do like this one, but doctors theories aren't always better than patient theories. And this theory takes as its jumping off point the Rituximab treatment, which wasn't exactly a roaring success. There are many ways to fit the puzzle pieces together that *feel* good to the hypothesiser and to the reader but don't actually reflect reality.
Still, if this theory helps some other researcher create a better experiment (or stops them wasting money on a bad experiment) then it has done a good job.
I hope Haukland hospital continues to produce great ME/CFS researchers who can test the hypotheses produced by Mella and Fluge