Ok it may be ol, but hear me out. I have come across people that have been exposed to hiv+ people, had all the symptoms and still tested negative. Some of these stories are from mid 2000 to 2011. I think that we should see if we can test for genes and proteins, just to rule it out. Ok here is another thing, when Nicolson found the mycoplasma, it had gp 120 protein/gene from hiv, but not the virus, which produced the same symptoms but it was not the virus. People tested hiv negative. Also when his daughter came home they all got sick. Now was she carrying this same mycoplasma incognitus fermentans, and if so does that mean that it can be airborne in some cases, if they all got sick? Joyce Riley as well said she got sick when working with the vets, so if these mycoplasmas have the part of the hiv gene in them, there must be a treatment and or test to find out.
Questions:
1.How does someone test to for the genes/proteins to hiv, especially if they had exposure to someone positive?
2.If this gene is part of the mycoplasma, can it be airborne?
So I am thinking that we should try to rule out genes/proteins, and we should look into testing for mycoplasmas.
This story always puzzeled me, this person below had contact with someone that was in aids stages. Now they say that mycoplasmas can be caught from perspiration. Does it sound like maybe that is what happened to this person?
http://www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SafeSex/Q222111.html
sorry to ramble on, but I think maybe these are some options that we should look into, so that if it is not these we can rule them out. Anything is possible!!
Can anyone explain a PCR, 24p antigen, western blot, elisa test? what does each look for? and a viral load test