MonkeyMan
Senior Member
- Messages
- 424
Yes I tried it and it did not help.
I'm sorry to hear that - both for you personally and for the rest of us, it does not bode well.
Yes I tried it and it did not help.
Is this the one in New York?
https://nybloodcenter.org/products-and-services/clinical-services/apheresis-services/
Has anyone from this board tried plasmapheresis? If so, did it help? (Apologies if this was posted already, I don't have the strength to read through this whole thread).
Dr Charles Shepherd of the ME Association said he had tried it without success and I have heard of a couple of others but neither reported improvement
I have a genetic tendency to a blood clotting disorder and had my first (superficial) clot when aged 15. I had several throughout my adult life, and now have had a number of TIAS, and small strokes. I gather about 8% of the population have a genetic tendency to develop clotting disorders, so perhaps this makes some of us prone to mico-clots following certain viral infections?
Sadly then it would seem thread has ran its course. Or have I misunderstood something. But I would love to be proved wrong. The microclots issue though one would have thought surely have some significance
In help, the plasma then gets treated and filtered, in plasmaexchange the plasma is being completely removed and replaced by synthetic plasma. I would love to be be wrong but that’s why I don’t see why help apheresis should work for cfs while plasmaexchange doesn’t.
I think it depends if the above-referenced plasmapheresis is different to H.E.L.P. aphersis. The latter is aimed at clearing the microclots, which the former may not be addressing.
I don't have sufficient knowledge or direct experience, but plasma exchange preserves the separated off cellular components of blood. Could the microclots persist along with the cellular component, unless specifically targeted by HELP?
I don't know how it would be practiced at the needle. It would be interesting though to see the results before and after apheresiswould that help inform Davis and team of a particular avenue or flavour of drug to try via the Nanoneedle ? presumably not applicable to the yeast version of the tests (where nanoneedle has CFS blood)
I'm thinking along the same lines.I don't have sufficient knowledge or direct experience, but plasma exchange preserves the separated off cellular components of blood. Could the microclots persist along with the cellular component, unless specifically targeted by HELP?
This might just be that you bruise easily.Could a biomarker be as simple as putting a band around someones wrist thats moderately tight and then seeing whether red marks appear after and how long they stay for
Sadly then it would seem thread has ran its course. Or have I misunderstood something. But I would love to be proved wrong. The microclots issue though one would have thought surely have some significance
Did you ever had a Factor V (Or F5) test? This is how I found out have this genetic mutation.
Mayo Clinic explains:
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/factor-v-leiden/symptoms-causes/syc-20372423
Seems it could be another dysregulated pathway that may contribute to the RBC membrane issue, prob as a result of the initial trigger that then causes all these downstream effects. Looks like phosphatidyl-ethanolamine decreases membrane fluidity, and phosphatidyl-choline increases it.Personally, I wonder if a reduced level of RBC membrane phospholipids may be relevant here:
Dysregulation of the Kennedy Pathway and Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle in ME/CFS (Che et al., 2021) (Pre-print)
https://forums.phoenixrising.me/thr...cle-in-me-cfs-che-et-al-2021-pre-print.84668/
I was told I have antiphospholipid syndrome.
I checked some of the labs in the US and they don't run venous oxygen saturation (SvO2). I think it needs to be done in a hospital or office set up to measure it because it needs to be done immediately before the O2 begins to disintegrate. Also seeing that it is usually done from a central venous catheter, but I think it can be done peripherally as well.Thank you so much for explaining that! Are they both blood tests except the first is drawn from an artery and the second is drawn from a vein (like any regular blood test)? Also, what would be the purpose of the second test (meaning what specifically is it measuring in relation to clotting or other factors)?
Thank you @Shanti1! While I'm still spit-balling...
Could the onset of the disease perhaps start with viral-induced platelet dysfunction and the resulting formation of fibrinogen micro-clots? As it takes hold and especially in those with increased exertion, later metabolic damage to the RBCs ensues, which causes them to be less deformable. I'm thinking how the disease might start with one thing wrong, that leads to a cascade and self-reinforcement.
In patients that recover, severe rest might have allowed the balance to tip more favourably, letting the RBCs start to regain their deformability and ultimately (months) there is clearance of the micro-clots.
Of course these observations may all be downstream from immune dysfunction. Good to see studies revisiting the potential theories of old, that were not duly followed-up over recent decades.
The technique is a specific type of apheresis called HELP apheresis.I have one other question (for anyone in this thread)... is the "apheresis" technique in this thread that is used to dissolve these micro-clots the same as when plasmapheresis is used for autoantibodies?
This link describes regular apheresis. If you are interested specifically in how HELP apheresis works, including the use of heparin to remove substances from the blood, see this link: https://vpjournal.net/article/view/3015Until we have Dr. Jaeger's research results published, we may look to the manufacturer for explanation what there machines do: https://www.fresenius-kabi.com/us/products/apheresis-collection-systems
If you have mast cell issues, that could be the cause....Could a biomarker be as simple as putting a band around someones wrist thats moderately tight and then seeing whether red marks appear after and how long they stay for ? I noticed that i've started getting them quite prominently after removing my heart rate monitor thing, they remain there for at least 10 minutes. I googled and I couldn't find a proper explanation for why we get red marks after wearing things but I wonder if it could be informative about what those red blood cells are doing.