Thanks for posting
@Diwi9 !
This Doc has the best understanding of ME/CFS in my opinion
I think he understands some great aspects, but is missing a lot. I agree with
@perrier and was horrified by his list of "treatments," for example.
it's clear to me that ME/CFS is a cardiovascular autonomic small fiber neuropathy
Er, only 44% had SFN. I've been tested and I don't...
A few thoughts:
Not everyone will be able to take pyridostigmine, due to allergens or side effects. I got it compounded and it did help me stand without being dizzy and exercise. As I raised the dose, the intestinal side effects were miserable.
Due to pharma game playing, the raw ingredient is no longer available for compounding in the US. I tried the sister drug, neostigmine, also compounded, which was effective without the side effects, but the half life was about 4 hours vs 12.
By then, I learned about a supplement, Huperzine A, and consulted with my neurologist on dosing, and tried a 200mg dose. No side effects, and I can stand and exercise.
I also have been taking phosphatidyl choline to repair damaged cell and mito membranes, and I believe it has a synergistic effect, making acetylcholine more available.
I highly recommend autonomic testing, which I was able to do with a dysautonomia specialist, a neurologist. The 4 tests are explained here - he concluded I had hypoperfusion in my brain, which the acetylcholine drugs have helped:
https://www.neuroassociates.us/autonomic-test-preparations.html
What I didn't see in Systrom's testing was metabolic testing that could be easily added to his testing protocol. I recently did it after Dr Kaufman suggested I listen to Peter Attia's interview with Inigo San Millan, a Colorado exercise physiology researcher, who discussed how shifting between carb and fat burning at different points, enables increasing exercise.
https://peterattiamd.com/inigosanmillan/
Looking around the medical community, there was nowhere to get the testing done, but buying a new pair of sports shoes at s local running store, they were able to refer me to a Seattle physical therapist who could do the same testing.
After talking her into letting me do the test, as she was scared I'd collapse, and my neurologist vouching for me that it wouldn't harm me, I did the test first thing in the morning, fasting.
First I put on a heart rate monitor around my chest and was fitted for a mask, similar to the one in the video. It was uncomfortable and squashed my face. It had a big vacuum cleaner type hose to collect all of the metabolites I made as I exhaled. I had to lay on a table for the first 20 minutes to get used to the mask and collect baseline data
Then, the hard part. On a treadmill, I had to pick a speed I could maintain (slower than she thought I should, but one that turned out to be a wise choice) and walk 4 minutes each at grades of 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12%. I stayed at the same speed, but it got increasingly difficult and I was stumbling by the end. The total test was 55 minutes and hard, something I wouldn't have been able to do a year ago, but I've been able to slowly walk 5 miles recently.
My results were abnormal, especially when compared to the athletes they normally see.
- My VO2max was 78% of normal, unlike Mona's
- My top pulse was 105, gated by the beta blocker I take for POTS, even though I was at max exertion
- I was burning carbohydrates at rest, when normal people burn fat
- Though I did burn fat at the easiest intensity, I quickly switched to burning carbs with slight effort. I should have been burning fat a lot longer, and did no have the typical crossover point they see in everyone else
The dietician I followed up with suggested upping my carbohydrates from 30% of calories to 50%. I typically eat 45-50% fat and 20-25% protein, which I've found after much experimentation feels vest for me - if I up carbs, I feel jittery and miserable.
However, he was puzzled by my abnormal burning if carbs instead of fat at rest, and said that the pattern of my results looked more like someone who had blood sugar problems, which I do not (fasting glucose is 80-95 and HbA1C has been 4.2-4.6).
The other explanation for all of this is that I have a fatty acid oxidation problem in my mitochondria, which my recent OAT and NutrEval tests suggest - all my glutaric metabolites were quite high, as they've been in previous tests. The interpretation has suggested low B2 or carnitine, but my carnitine metabolite levels are fine and I'm taking 290mg B2 a day, and there's no way I can be short. Therefore, the remaining explanation is a fatty acid oxidation problem in mitochondria which I'm trying to find someone to help with. I also have below range pyruvate.
I sure wish Systrom would collect other people's metabolites and see if they have similar issues.
Neil McGregor had suggested I had a glycolysis problem (which might lead to the low pyruvate) and less than optimal storage of glycogen in muscles. But, I haven't seen any explanation for why be a body that's given plenty of fat, and should be burning fat, chooses to burn glucose from glycogen when it doesn't have enough. Sure explains my perception of being drained in my arms and legs and my brain giving up when I increase intensity even for as short as 90 seconds.
It seems that they're handling this as a plumbing problem when, for at least some of us, it's a biochemistry and energy production problem.
But it's a good start...
