I read through the paper that you linked and that is amazing that all of those diagnoses are ruled out in the UK before an ME/CFS diagnosis is made. This simply is not done in the US and I cannot imagine that it ever will be. Insurance companies would never pay for all of that and the average doctor is not very familiar with ME/CFS.
We are lucky that we do have specialists (but they are few and far between). My specialist initially diagnosed me with ME/CFS (as did every other doctor that I saw in 2013 and 2014) but then he dug deeper to figure out what was going on in my case and he felt that other diagnoses were a better match. But I am extremely lucky to have him (he is the same doctor as Jeff and many others in this thread). He really looks at each individual case as it presents (immune symptoms, dysautonomia, structural issues, viruses, neurological, cardiac, endocrine, autoimmunity, mast cell, or whatever the case may be).
I think the individuals who have symptoms similar to Jeff and Jen's are now pursuing the appropriate testing (such as a cervical MRI) to see if they fall into that group. To me, this is an appropriate thing to do, and there are cases of people finding CSF leaks or brain stem compression that would never have been found without the appropriate tests and imaging (MRI, etc). Why would someone not correct this (if it is found on imaging and diagnosed by a qualified doctor and/or surgeon)?
How do we know that there are not some cases in which ME/CFS has a structural cause? It seems that there are many subgroups and co-morbidities. From your paper that you linked, it would rule out anyone even with anemia or Hashimoto's as a "misdiagnosis" (if I am understanding it correctly?) let alone with POTS, MCAS, or CCI.
I cannot possibly know either but I have never found it helpful to diagnose other people and it has been challenging enough to try to obtain the correct diagnosis for myself!
I totally agree with you on this
@Wayne (and I know that we don't always agree on everything!) but I appreciate the way that you explained it. I agree that some people have a much lesser form and that temporarily wearing a cervical collar or doing PT or traction is all that is needed (and surgery is too risky or not even necessary in those cases).
I am having a cervical MRI on Mon b/c I have bulging discs, cervical stenosis, and radiculopathy (where the neck pain radiates down my arm). My doctor does NOT believe that I have CCI and I agree. But if the MRI can pinpoint what is going on, it might help my current PT or confirm that I should purchase an at-home traction device. I am not considering surgery, no matter what is found, b/c it is too risky for me on all levels (and I don't even think it would pertain to my case). But I cannot see how getting the MRI and having that information could hurt, especially b/c my doctor has strongly recommended it.
My symptoms are very different than Jeff's, and I hate posting about someone else, but am hoping he will jump in so he can speak for himself! I visited him in hospital (several months) prior to surgery and his suffering was unimaginable. I rejoice that the proper diagnosis and treatment was found for him. He is sharing it in case it pertains to others (and for some it will and for others it will not). I think that is a great thing.