Daffodil
Senior Member
- Messages
- 5,885
i left a nice little message on ERV's blog in which i used the C word. wonder if she will delete it lol
Any chance this "leak" was leaked on purpose to soften the blow to the public, break them in, so to speak?
Sunny
I'm not feeling very good today, so if this comment is redundant or just super obvious pardon me, but did anyone else notice on slide 27 (the 1st un-numbered slide towards the end of the presentation) that it lists XMRV as a prioritized EID threat as of August 2009 and also says "The only barriers to rapid development and implementation of such diagnostic testing capabilities are regulatory, not technical." Regulatory, not technical??!!
Take a look at the box on the right titled "Blood Product & Tissue Safety Priority Level." It is color coded with High in red, Moderate in orange, Low in yellow, and then a blank box that is white. The only viruses in red are Dengue 1, 2, 3, 4. XMRV is in white.
I think in August 2009, XMRV did not make a priority level. At least that is how it looks to me. What is confusing, though, is that HIV is only a yellow. Maybe that is after they have already tried to screen out all possible HIV blood donors?
If none of this makes sense, I claim brain fog (although this is actually a pretty good brain day for me).
:Retro smile:
Hate to rain on the parade, but this is the key statement:
All the study or studies say is that people with CFS have a higher chance of being infected with XMRV. That could be the equivalent of saying people with CFS have a higher chance of having long toenails. Nothing yet has proved that XMRV causes CFS, or that XMRV is even dangerous in any way except possibly being implicated in prostate cancer. So perhaps this study or study to be released (?) by NIH/FDA will be a small step forward, but there still is no evidence that XMRV causes CFS or any of the symptoms.
As to Whittemore releasing info. Likely they are coauthors. So they aren't supposed to say anything.
Now, Dutch reporters and Dutch blood supply agency, they are independent.
Tina
The scientists who collaborated on this new study did their work entirely independently of the authors of last October's groundbreaking Science paper.
As to Whittemore releasing info. Likely they are coauthors. So they aren't supposed to say anything.
Now, Dutch reporters and Dutch blood supply agency, they are independent.
Tina
Andrea is the excited poster today. Sorry looks like there are embargo policies that need to be followed just like Science paper so I'm erasing anything to do with earlier info. But Hooray for Progress.
Fascinating to see a story get picked up by news services as it does. It is like watching something grow.
Ok, I just have to say. This news has gone viral.
Bwa ha ha ha.
Tina
Picked up by news services? I got nada on news.google, except the MMD release. Did anyone figure out what MMD Newswire, like, is? I googled it but the results were not informative.