So you think humans were meant to be indoors, surrounded by blue light? Is that a good environment for mitochondria to function? You do not think nnEMF causing calcium efflux?
Humans have been living in some form of a house or home for hundreds of thousands of years. You know, to protect themselves from the elements, to warm themselves near a fire. Of course it's common sense that if one can, one should try to get out in nature whenever possible, but to suggest humans weren't meant to be indoors is just, well, narrow-minded.
And who in the world is '
surrounded by blue light indoors? Sure, many of us may be on our computers too late at night which can mess with circadian rhythms, but "
surrounded"?
No, I do not believe EMFs are causing calcium efflux. Multiple studies have shown that what patients believe are effects from EMFs are actually their beliefs (the 'nocebo' effect) that are causing the effects:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19681059
"46 blind or double-blind provocation studies in all, involving 1175 IEI-EMF volunteers, have tested whether exposure to electromagnetic fields is responsible for triggering symptoms in IEI-EMF.
No robust evidence could be found to support this theory. However, the studies included in the review
did support the role of the nocebo effect in triggering acute symptoms in IEI-EMF sufferers. Despite the conviction of IEI-EMF sufferers that their symptoms are triggered by exposure to electromagnetic fields, repeated experiments have been unable to replicate this phenomenon under controlled conditions."
http://www.jpsychores.com/article/S0022-3999(12)00335-2/abstract
"Participants (
N=147) were randomly assigned to watch a television report about the adverse health effects of WiFi (
n=76) or a control film (
n=71). After watching their film, participants received a
sham exposure to a WiFi signal (15 min). 82 (54%) of the 147 participants reported symptoms which they attributed to the sham exposure."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_hypersensitivity
"A systematic review in 2005 showed no convincing scientific evidence for symptoms being caused by electromagnetic fields.
[2] Since then, several
double-blind experiments have shown that people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity are unable to detect the presence of electromagnetic fields and are
as likely to report ill health following a sham exposure as they are following exposure to genuine electromagnetic fields, suggesting the cause in these cases to be the
nocebo effect."
Evelyn from the Carb-Sane blog explains it better than I can, and most concisely in her answers in the comments section:
"The internal EMF in our mitochondria/cells are electro-motive forces from separation of charge across a membrane. The external EMF is electro-magnetic field. If fields could alter cellular EMFs we'd all be dead!"
"Jack thrives on mumbo jumbo and that most just don't have the background to know how out there he is. If EMF did what he said, there wouldn't be MRIs or they would kill!"
http://carbsanity.blogspot.com/2012/03/quantum-bullshit.html
@brenda, I'm sincerely glad you're doing better, but as others have pointed out, getting some sunlight and walking barefoot and eating more fish, etc., is kind of common sense advice that will generally help most of us. If we could get out that is. Anyway, I hope your improvements continue.
And by the way, I do know of one other person on the forums who has benefited from his 'cold thermogenesis'.