taniaaust1
Senior Member
- Messages
- 13,054
- Location
- Sth Australia
Would you know if that 30 bpm threshold definitely applies to the active standing test, as well as the tilt table test? I know for the tilt table test, it is definitely 30 bpm.
In the 2006 Dr Satish Raj paper I quoted above, it says that when you stand using your own muscle power (active standing), this acts to compress the blood vessels more than when you are passively placed in an upright position using the tilt table. The paper says that is due to the skeletal muscle pump, which is important in countering orthostatic intolerance when standing.
So via this skeletal muscle pump, active standing compensates a little bit for your POTS, whereas the tilt table does not compensate.
So that's why I believe in the 2006 paper, Dr Raj refers to the criteria used by Streeten et al, which is a 27 bpm threshold for POTS diagnosis on the active standing test, to account for the effects of the skeletal muscle pump.
But yes, this is back in 2006, so this criterion may well be out of date now. It would be nice to find an up-to-date paper detailing the criteria for both the tilt table test and the active standing test.
That's probably why it has been found by a study that standing test is the better of the two being more sensitive.
POTS is like ME/CFS.. people use different definitions and I dont think its like set into hard stone yet so all we can go by is what the general consensus out there currently in our medical communities on what POTS is.. and use that definition
Not that I trust wiki much but it states there "The hallmark sign of POTS is a measured increase in heart rate by at least 30 beats per minute within 10 minutes of assuming an upright position.[1] For people aged between 12 and 19, the minimum increase for diagnosis is 40 beats per minute.[2] "
and all the doctors Ive seen (all 4 who did standing test on me) went by the 30 beats per min on standing test (poor mans test)
Last edited: