BurnA
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,087
The last person would have got treatment in June according to website.Or the trial has had adverse effects and they're stopping early...
The last person would have got treatment in June according to website.Or the trial has had adverse effects and they're stopping early...
The last person would have got treatment in June according to website.
I don't think it would be related to side effects.What I mean is: if they don't think it's a viable treatment due to the side effects, they'd choose not to wait for the follow up and publishing the data they have.
Based on an analysis of the preliminary response and toxicity data from CycloME, part A, we have concluded that in order to extend the trial to include patients with severe to very severe ME, we need to adjust the protocol and plan the intervention and follow-up of each patient with great care. In order to gain more experience with this highly vulnerable group of patients, we are planning a pilot study involving a smaller number of participants. The change of protocol will be subject to approval by the Regional Ethics’ committee and the Norwegian Medicines Agency. We will select candidates for participation in the pilot study from the list of candidates for CycloME part B, and will contact the relevant candidates directly.
In the event that the interim results from CycloME part A should indicate a clinically relevant response/improvement in symptoms in a minimum of 40 % of the patients, the trial may be extended to include patients with very severe ME.
Status, CycloME part A
The medical intervention phase has been completed, and all participants are now in the follow-up phase.
We have applied for an extension of the follow-up period by 6 additional months, thus completing the trial in July 2017.
We are aiming to publish the results from the CycloME trial, part A, in 2017.
They will also extend the follow up by 6 months.
I would guess they have a 40+% response rate, but maybe some participants had some nasty side effects and/or relapses in their disease.
They seem to be taking an extra careful approach with part B.
I do too.Should be we interpret that as a 40+% response rate in Part A? I do.
Why adjust the protocol though?
I would guess that at lest part of modifying the protocol has to do with some severe side effects experienced by some participants, and that they have to be more careful with the severly ill. I know two people who participated. One got so ill she had to withdraw from the study, and another finished it because she wanted to stay true to her commitment, but had no response and also had severe side effects and worsening of symptoms of which she has not recovered from yet. This is not a drug to be messed with, but anxious to see results. I heard preliminiary findings will be presented this fall, but no paper until next year.
I would guess that at lest part of modifying the protocol has to do with some severe side effects experienced by some participants, and that they have to be more careful with the severly ill. I know two people who participated. One got so ill she had to withdraw from the study, and another finished it because she wanted to stay true to her commitment, but had no response and also had severe side effects and worsening of symptoms of which she has not recovered from yet. This is not a drug to be messed with, but anxious to see results. I heard preliminiary findings will be presented this fall, but no paper until next year.
How come success stories never make their way to the forums?
A positive note: My Rituximab doctor had three patients who didn't respond to Rituximab at Haukeland. They all responded to Cyclo, so somebody did respond .
Very uplifting yes! And hopefully will lead to even more treatment options for people like my friend who is still worse from the cyclo and who also didn`t respond to Rituxan. I myself did not respond to Rituxan, and my hope is to try cyclo privately within the next year. Think it all depends on when they are presenting preliminary results, so very anxious to find out!
Don't Fluge and Mella have some conferences coming up - does anyone expect them to share any details soon ?Think it all depends on when they are presenting preliminary results, so very anxious to find out!