I guess I am in the minority in the way I feel about this discussion as I was in the thread that Joyful lady started. There are things that defy logic and cannot always be explained. If something has helped or even cured someone of an illness...........why does it really matter what the method was? Why do some supplements help some and not others? Why can a healer help some and not others? I am so happy for the few that have recovered from whatever method worked for them. Do we always have to have explanations? I have not been cured from CFS and I have done everything from standard, medical to what some term "new age". For me..........I have not concluded that because these things didn't work for me.....that they may not work for another. Please .............no tomato throwing!
It all depends on what claims are being made, Tammy, and the motivation behind such claims.
For example, we are told that ME is a psychiatric disease, and that CBT and GET are effective in
treating ME. They don't say that CBT and GET will simply help us cope with living with a chronic illness, but they say that CBT/GET will
treat the actual illness. This claim about the therapeutic effect of CBT/GET gives power and credibility to their claim that ME is a psychiatric illness. But when they carried out rigorous medical trials, it turns out that the psychiatrists were misinterpreting natural fluctuations, or a placebo response, as a therapeutic effect, and in fact CBT/GET are of little help (as we all already knew.)
The same goes for the Lightning Process. They have made all sorts of claims in the past, about its efficacy, and they charge up to £800/$1000 for a three day 'training' program. But the Lightning Process is little more than a positive thinking course, so it's not going to
treat a physical illness, any more than CBT/GET do.
That's not to say that CBT or LP or Hypnosis etc., can't help people feel better about themselves in some way.
Some patients might feel better after undergoing these therapies, but unless a rigorous study is carried out, then we don't know if their illness actually responded to the therapy, or if they just experienced natural fluctuations, or if it was just the placebo effect that they experienced, or if they just experienced a psychological boost which maybe helped them out of a mental rut that they had got into, which had nothing directly to do with the actual symptoms of ME.
So we've got to have claims of therapeutic 'effect' backed up with evidence.
Otherwise, resources get diverted into the wrong areas of research, because the illness is misunderstood.
Not to mention vulnerable patients getting ripped off.
There are always going to be anecdotal reports of improvements, for all types of therapies.
If therapists were to claim that they had a 'therapy' that made some patients better able to cope with living with a chronic illness, but that they couldn't help improve the illness itself, then I wouldn't have a such problem with them offering their services. But they don't usually offer money-back guarantees, so I'd still have a bit of a problem with it.