anciendaze
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,841
The standard assumption by doctors is generally anxiety->tachycardia and dyspnea, which is possible. However, there should be no question that unexplained tachycardia and dyspnea will cause anxiety. So, we also have tachycardia->anxiety and dyspnea->anxiety, (if not panic.)
When there was an error in medication once I spent a couple of hours wondering if my heart would hold together while it beat at close to 160 beats per minute. Eventually the overdose wore off without medical intervention.
I definitely did have anxiety, but that was not the cause of the problem.
Finding anxiety, or even a "crazy" patient, should not be the end of the process. I've seen full-scale psychotic episodes triggered by physical causes, like anaphylaxis, which had nothing to do with the patient's prior sanity. As a survivor of the 1960s, I also saw many people who temporarily met all the requirements for a diagnosis of mania or schizophrenia as a result of drugs they had taken. Some of them never came back from other planes of existence after they turned-on, tuned-in and dropped-out, but a surprising number now hold very respectable positions. (This is not to say that I recommend this approach to enlightenment. I was careful to avoid such when I was young, and I think the differences in results are apparent in my thinking today.)
One other thing, even while they were off on excursions to alternate planes of existence ordinary lab tests usually didn't show anything useful, in those cases where it was possible to run tests. (It is hard to run thorough tests on a patient hiding from aerial bombardment under a car in the parking lot.)
As a result of this experience I became rather skeptical about most cases of "functional" psychiatric illnesses. I suspect we simply aren't testing for the right things. I've known patients with bipolar disorder (manic-depressive), who change back and forth almost like clockwork. The strange thing is that even with this going on, and in a fairly predictable manner, we still can't tell what is chemically different between the phases of the illness. There is no shortage of subjects for research.
This is a problem with the current state of the art, and it is unreasonable to expect the whole profession to change to accommodate you. Do your best to keep things moving forward without claiming to know what is going on, (nobody else does,) or getting classified as unreasonable and/or crazy. Do not expect instant answers.
When there was an error in medication once I spent a couple of hours wondering if my heart would hold together while it beat at close to 160 beats per minute. Eventually the overdose wore off without medical intervention.
I definitely did have anxiety, but that was not the cause of the problem.
Finding anxiety, or even a "crazy" patient, should not be the end of the process. I've seen full-scale psychotic episodes triggered by physical causes, like anaphylaxis, which had nothing to do with the patient's prior sanity. As a survivor of the 1960s, I also saw many people who temporarily met all the requirements for a diagnosis of mania or schizophrenia as a result of drugs they had taken. Some of them never came back from other planes of existence after they turned-on, tuned-in and dropped-out, but a surprising number now hold very respectable positions. (This is not to say that I recommend this approach to enlightenment. I was careful to avoid such when I was young, and I think the differences in results are apparent in my thinking today.)
One other thing, even while they were off on excursions to alternate planes of existence ordinary lab tests usually didn't show anything useful, in those cases where it was possible to run tests. (It is hard to run thorough tests on a patient hiding from aerial bombardment under a car in the parking lot.)
As a result of this experience I became rather skeptical about most cases of "functional" psychiatric illnesses. I suspect we simply aren't testing for the right things. I've known patients with bipolar disorder (manic-depressive), who change back and forth almost like clockwork. The strange thing is that even with this going on, and in a fairly predictable manner, we still can't tell what is chemically different between the phases of the illness. There is no shortage of subjects for research.
This is a problem with the current state of the art, and it is unreasonable to expect the whole profession to change to accommodate you. Do your best to keep things moving forward without claiming to know what is going on, (nobody else does,) or getting classified as unreasonable and/or crazy. Do not expect instant answers.