• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

What do you think of the IOM's new name for ME/CFS? VOTE!

What do you think of the IOM's new name for ME/CFS: SEID

  • Better than the status quo, but I wouldn't endorse it myself

    Votes: 27 16.9%
  • Better than the status quo, patients should get behind this

    Votes: 32 20.0%
  • No better than the status quo (most reseachers/clincians use CFS, occasionally ME/CFS)

    Votes: 19 11.9%
  • A waste of time

    Votes: 58 36.3%
  • Better than the status quo, but I'm unsure at this time whether I would endorse it myself.

    Votes: 24 15.0%

  • Total voters
    160
  • Poll closed .

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567
I previously went to a specialist (a cardiologist) to try to get help for my orthostatic symptoms (problems being upright). He was focused on getting me moving: he wanted me to get me "out of the wheelchair". I think it would be easier to direct a doctor away from that approach with a name like "Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease" than, say, "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome".
 
Last edited:

Dx Revision Watch

Suzy Chapman Owner of Dx Revision Watch
Messages
3,061
Location
UK
Further information on problems with eponyms in medical terminology


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_eponymously_named_diseases

-----------------

http://www.the-rheumatologist.org/details/article/1066231/Medical_Societies_Ask_Whats_in_a_Name.html

From: The Rheumatologist, May 2011
Medical Societies Ask, What's in a Name?

ICD-11, history, and confusion a catalyst for replacing eponyms with descriptions in disease nomenclature

-------------------

Paper on eponyms and clinical terminology systems:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613025/

Case Report Medical Eponyms
An Applied Clinical Informatics Opportunity


Appl Clin Inform. 2012; 3(3): 349–355.
 

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567
I know plenty of people who need home help and care services, but often struggle to get assessed as needing them.

I think they could have a better chance of being approved and getting the required amount of help with a name like “systemic exertion intolerance disease” than “chronic fatigue syndrome” (and maybe myalgic encephalomyelitis also).
 

MeSci

ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
Messages
8,231
Location
Cornwall, UK
Further information on problems with eponyms in medical terminology


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_eponymously_named_diseases

-----------------

http://www.the-rheumatologist.org/details/article/1066231/Medical_Societies_Ask_Whats_in_a_Name.html

From: The Rheumatologist, May 2011
Medical Societies Ask, What's in a Name?

ICD-11, history, and confusion a catalyst for replacing eponyms with descriptions in disease nomenclature

-------------------

Paper on eponyms and clinical terminology systems:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613025/

Case Report Medical Eponyms
An Applied Clinical Informatics Opportunity


Appl Clin Inform. 2012; 3(3): 349–355.

I find the arguments against eponyms weak and easy to counter. If there are two similar names for different diseases - change one. The proposals are to change names anyway.

Does the political ideology of the person after whom a disease in named really matter? If there are really strong objections - again, use another name - of one kind or another, as a name change is being proposed anyway.

Different names used in different countries - this also occurs with non-eponymous disease names, and some of these are extremely difficult to translate between languages. I think that the same eponymous names would actually be easier to keep across different countries.

And illnesses referred to in the articles/papers are diseases which have been well-characterised following a lot of research. Ours hasn't. Ours does not have just one or two characteristic features, we don't yet know if there are subgroups with different causes/symptoms, etc.

I think that an eponymous name is ideal for our current situation. Our illness/illnesses can always be renamed when we have better understanding of it/them.
 

picante

Senior Member
Messages
829
Location
Helena, MT USA
I have been asked how to translate 'exertion intolerance' into one of the languages I know and it is impossible to do this without *very* negative connotations (English is a very word-rich language with some terms being very specific... which is not always the case in other languages).
I just checked TERMIUM, the Canadian government's bilingual terminology database. "Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease" has not made it into the database yet. However, I did find exertional rhobdonyolysis.:
http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tp...1&index=ent&srchtxt=EXERTIONAL RHOBDONYOLYSIS

I'm thinking we should hold out for that one. I really like it.
 

MeSci

ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
Messages
8,231
Location
Cornwall, UK

lansbergen

Senior Member
Messages
2,512
I just checked TERMIUM, the Canadian government's bilingual terminology database. "Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease" has not made it into the database yet. However, I did find exertional rhobdonyolysis.:
http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2alpha/alpha-eng.html?lang=eng&i=1&index=ent&srchtxt=EXERTIONAL RHOBDONYOLYSIS

I'm thinking we should hold out for that one. I really like it.

I do not.

Horses can get stiff and not able to move from eating to much protein. Ever seen a horse after it ate to much oats?
 
Last edited:

MeSci

ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
Messages
8,231
Location
Cornwall, UK
Another survey on the name. One doesn't need to be a member of a forum to fill it in.

http://paradigmchange.me/wp/name-evaluation/

Thanks - done it! It's clear that one doesn't need to be a US citizen to do it, because it asks you to state your nationality near the end. I was also surprised to see that it included the apostrophe-s in the list of eponymous names, which I thought tends to be dropped in the US. Acheson's name was not in the list.
 

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567
So, what do you think about the new name?
March 2
by Erica Verrillo
http://cfstreatment.blogspot.ie/2015/03/so-what-do-you-think-about-new-name.html

Info on the name change issue plus links to 3 polls (I have highlighted these three polls before).

Interesting to read neither (Paul) Cheney nor Daniel (Peterson) wants the illness named after them. It may make such a name a non-runner.

Note: while the blogger is correct that the report said 94% had pain, she omits that only 73% had myalgia = muscle pain.
 

charles shepherd

Senior Member
Messages
2,239
MEA is running a website poll for UK residents on the IoM name change proposal

Current voting after first five days below

The figure of 60% for 'don't like SEID' has remained fairly steady since we opened the poll

The MEA Quick Survey

  • Should CFS and/or ME be renamed Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID) as recommended in the U.S. Institute of Medicine Report?
    • Yes - but for CFS only (12%, 48 Votes)

    • Yes - but for ME only (4%, 18 Votes)

    • Yes - for CFS and ME (14%, 57 Votes)

    • Not sure (8%, 34 Votes)

    • No opinion (1%, 5 Votes)

    • No - do not like SEID (61%, 253 Votes)


      Total Voters: 415
 

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567
Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease gives permission not to exert, I think, and so somebody should be eligible for supports e.g. disability payments, aids, etc.

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome can be spun in various ways and is more vulnerable to people saying one should just push through, I think.