Jonathan Edwards
"Gibberish"
- Messages
- 5,256
I agree with the general drift of the posts above. As a professor of medicine my view is that 'medically unexplained symptoms' as a 'diagnosis' or speciality is drivel. There are lots of medically unexplained symptoms around but that is not what this is about. They are just symptoms we do not fully understand. It seems clear that 'MUS' is a codename for 'the patient thinks they are ill but they are not'. The extraordinary thing to me is that doctors should think that they can have names like this and put them on clinic doors. Do they think the patients are complete idiots? Yes, I guess they do. They are supposed to be skilled in psychology yet what sort of skill in psychology allows you to say to patients that they are being seen for a disease which consists of them being silly enough to think they have a disease they have not got.
This sort of BS started way back in the 1990s but has gathered pace (or even PACE). It is a symptom of the general dumbing down of medicine that has occurred recently, nd also the pseudo-commercial framework that has taken over the NHS.
How you handle this I really do not know. But you could say that a professor of medicine at UCH who is a friend of yours says that MUS is bullshit - could they please explain why he is wrong?
This sort of BS started way back in the 1990s but has gathered pace (or even PACE). It is a symptom of the general dumbing down of medicine that has occurred recently, nd also the pseudo-commercial framework that has taken over the NHS.
How you handle this I really do not know. But you could say that a professor of medicine at UCH who is a friend of yours says that MUS is bullshit - could they please explain why he is wrong?