Biarritz13
Senior Member
- Messages
- 699
- Location
- France
Is there any difference between American Gut Project and uBiome?
They use the same type of DNA sequencing, are crowd funded and make results available directly to you.
They use different ways of preserving sample which means that American Gut requires return of sample within 72 h - uBiome doesn't have this requirement (sample is stable for several weeks).
If you live in the USA this doesn't matter much but for those outside the USA, this can make a big difference in shipping cost.
There are some differences in DNA extraction techniques which can lead to some discrepancies when comparing results between the two.
Finally there seems to be a vast difference in turn around time - about 5 months for American Gut, about 4 weeks for uBiome.
a big change in Bacteroidetes, maybe due to the different breakdown used between Ubiome and Redlabs and included in Other.
there seems to be a vast difference in turn around time - about 5 months for American Gut
So uBiome seems like an all round better service to me.
I couldn't read the Redlabs report properly but it seems to me that Other means Phyla other than the four listed (ie Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria). This would include things like Verrucomicrobia, Euryarchaeota, Lentispherae which uBiome listed - it wouldn't affect Bacteroidetes.
10.28% is high for these minor phyla - do they give any other info on what is included in this - or could you ask them?
They must have some idea of what is included to be able to put a figure on it.
Others have reported a big overgrowth of Akkermansia (Verrucomicrobia) - that might account for it.
No idea whether HBOT would affect the microbiome but it certainly seems possible to me.
Have you benefitted from the therapy?
@Theodore I also would be skeptic, if HBOT does harm to the microbiome. Maybe you could do a test before and afterwards?
the MSA 2 shows all the "Other".
I truly don't have (enough) Bifido and Lactobacillus
do you think this improvement in diet is transposable to the variations?
I was wrong in thinking that Other referred to other phyla. It is a rather bizarre category, including members of previously listed phyla along with a few unclassified (ie genuine Other). Hard to fathom why, for example, members of the Firmicutes are listed here and not in the category Firmicutes.
Anyhow I see that the predominant members of Other are two Clostridia families - ie Firmicutes.
I've been trying to increase Bifido for years with not much success. Sometimes it increases only to plummet again later, for no reason that I can determine.
Impossible to say. I've seen gut changes apparently in response to dietary changes but, with time, despite maintaining the dietary change, the gut has tended to revert to the previous pattern.
I wouldn't worry too much about the Lactobacillus - our ideas of its importance have been greatly distorted by the probiotic industry and culture-based stool tests.
Lactobacillus is much more important in the mouth, vagina and probably small intestine. Very few strains actually colonise the colon, most are just passing through.
Bifido is an important coloniser of the colon, although of course there is always the Hazda who apparently get by without it.
I´m not sure, if you are right. Hazas have no bifidos, but have other members of the microbiome, that undertake the function of the bifidos, that we possibly are missing.