SOC
Senior Member
- Messages
- 7,849
It's kinda funny to me how some people get to call themselves professors of medicine when they have nothing but an undergraduate degree in medicine.
Well that explains a lot.
It's kinda funny to me how some people get to call themselves professors of medicine when they have nothing but an undergraduate degree in medicine.
Probably part of the brainwashing technique.8 million dollar trial and they couldn't find anywhere else than a 10 meters hallway to perform a 6 minutes walk test?
...the large and elegant PACE trial.
Perspectives
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12, 539-544 (September 2011) | doi:10.1038/nrn3087
http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v12/n9/full/nrn3087.html
Health in mind and body: bridging the gap
http://www.foundation.org.uk/events/audios/audiopdf.htm?e=440&s=1200
[Wessely] described PACE as the 'final definitive trial' and as 'one of the most beautiful behavioural medicine trials we have ever seen'. He showed the timeline fatigue graph (fig 2A in the paper) and called it a 'good result: we have improved - haven't cured - the physical health, the psychological health, the functioning etc of a large number of people'.
http://forums.phoenixrising.me/show...Trial-Protocol&p=178575&viewfull=1#post178575
...the large and elegant PACE trial.
Oh, please! That's just outright delusional. Even if it was decent research, which it most definitely is not, describing it as among the top research studies of all time is absurd. "Elegant"? "Beautiful"? Seriously?? And people take this guy seriously when he makes statements like that? Aren't other researchers who have done elegant and definitive research offended by his cavalier claims of superiority?[Wessely] described PACE as the 'final definitive trial' and as 'one of the most beautiful behavioural medicine trials we have ever seen'.
[Wessely] described PACE as the 'final definitive trial' and as 'one of the most beautiful behavioural medicine trials we have ever seen'. He showed the timeline fatigue graph (fig 2A in the paper) and called it a 'good result: we have improved - haven't cured - the physical health, the psychological health, the functioning etc of a large number of people'.
"På ME-fronten: Kommer The Lancet til å utføre en ny uavhengig fagfellevurdering av PACE-studien?"
https://totoneimbehl.wordpress.com/...-uavhengig-fagfellevurdering-av-pace-studien/
Hi all-
I wanted to let everyone that all of us at #MEAction are working on a petition to demand that the Lancet retract the papers based on the PACE trial and that NICE guidelines be updated to removed any recommendations based on the irreparably faulty study. We hope to get this up in the next few days, and will work with knowledgeable patients and supporters in the UK and elsewhere to make sure that we get the language right.
Also - great to have @Tom Kindlon there as a representative of patient concerns about PACE, instead of Wessely and White's description of why patients are concerned about PACE.
Thanks. We will definitely include the Cochrane review as well. We are trying to decide if there should be three petitions-- one focused solely on a retraction by the Lancet, one focused on the UK guidelines, and one on the US ones, although all could be signed by people worldwide since US and UK guidelines impact everyone.Thank you for your work.
The NICE guidelines need attention badly.
Are you including the Cohrane review, too?
Also I think the P2P report still grades PACE as good quality evidence (it sounds almost like this was mostly because if they excluded it, they would have no evidence for their main points of CBT/GET, but, well, maybe they were given the wrong mandate!).
When, like Dr Yasmin, they can live and practice outside the UK...?When are the other UK doctors going to follow this brave young doctor's example and stand up for patients and science?
Hi all-
I wanted to let everyone that all of us at #MEAction are working on a petition to demand that the Lancet retract the papers based on the PACE trial and that NICE guidelines be updated to removed any recommendations based on the irreparably faulty study. We hope to get this up in the next few days, and will work with knowledgeable patients and supporters in the UK and elsewhere to make sure that we get the language right.
I did David Tuller journalist MEcfs PACE trial and got a top hitI just did a Google search for:
"david tuller" "pace trial" "trial by error"
Very few results at the moment. Perhaps other search terms would give better results but at the moment there doesn't seem to be much besides ME/CFS Facebook groups/pages and a few of the free online newspapers that aggregate Twitter tweets.
"David Tuller" doesn't give any news results.
This series by David Tuller is really good. My deepest appreciation to all involved!
How can we best capitalize on this work?
I am just putting a couple of thoughts out here but hope others will add to/build on them.
Would getting a retraction of all things PACE be sufficient for people?
What effect would that have (or not) on other material out there for healthcare professionals and the public? (I am referring to healthcare education materials around the world)?
What steps are involved in a concerted effort to address any/all of this?