There are a lot of articles listed here.
We want to highlight the best ones -- get them to the top of the search ratings. That means searching the titles and clicking on the found link (as
@oceiv) said above. OTOH, we don't really want to give a lot of traffic to the bad ones.
Are people who read these articles willing to give a quick rating (A-F?) so the rest of us know whether to give a particular article a boost or not?
While we need to correct misinformation in bad articles, we have to be careful about giving more attention to bad behavior than to good. Any attention is good attention in some media books and we don't want to encourage those who write garbage.
I see a two-pronged goal here:
1) we want to encourage sound, scientific, sympathetic writers to keep writing on the topic... and their editors to want to publish such articles, and
2) we want people who search to learn more about SEID to find the most accurate and informative articles.
How best to accomplish these goals?