If I'm proven wrong, that means there is a viral solution to our problem. I should be happy.
This has been going on for the past 25 years. In Osler's Web, Hillary Johnson talks about Cheney's claim of having great results with Acyclovir trial. Then later it talks about a controlled trial showing no effect. And then there is Montoya trial that failed in double-blind after a sentational initial claim. The bottom line is that, if there was any credible evidence, it would've made it into the standard treatment protocol in Canadian Consensus, etc.
Here is another example of conflict of interest claiming stunning 30 out of 33 improvements in controlled double blind trial:
http://www.endfatigue.com/resources/Effective-Treatment-Of-Severe-Chronic-Fatigue-States.html
I have a copy from my correspondence with Montoya's office back in 2008. It is not likely to get published ever. Montoya has a better sense than that I'm sure.