Well, I've (partially) defended Tweetlebaum in the past, but this time he really was shameless, and the resulting article, shameful.
Even though it is a blog, and not part of their regular publication, anger and/or disapproval should also be directed at Psychology Today, especially for allowing those direct links to T's website in the piece.
Sheesh.
d.
Hey danny - sheesh indeed!
The disappointing part to me is that shameless self-promotion like this, with a dash of fear-mongering thrown in, and continually mixing up chronic fatigue with ME/CFS and presenting a basically fake study, while dismissing real science with unbacked claims as to how ME/CFS really works discounts whatever contributions he has made to the field and people's lives.
I thought you'd like that I started off with a Dr Philism "Psychology Today, what were you thinking?"
if