Well, I've (partially) defended Tweetlebaum in the past, but this time he really was shameless, and the resulting article, shameful.
Even though it is a blog, and not part of their regular publication, anger and/or disapproval should also be directed at Psychology Today, especially for allowing those direct links to T's website in the piece.
Sheesh.
d.
Even though it is a blog, and not part of their regular publication, anger and/or disapproval should also be directed at Psychology Today, especially for allowing those direct links to T's website in the piece.
Sheesh.
d.
The disappointing part to me is that shameless self-promotion like this, with a dash of fear-mongering thrown in, and continually mixing up chronic fatigue with ME/CFS and presenting a basically fake study, while dismissing real science with unbacked claims as to how ME/CFS really works discounts whatever contributions he has made to the field and people's lives.
I thought you'd like that I started off with a Dr Philism "Psychology Today, what were you thinking?"
if