godlovesatrier
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,616
- Location
- United Kingdom
Hoping this isn't old news. I hope not. But wanted to get peoples thoughts:
So I'm assuming this is newly published info.
Thought I'd check my htma from this year and my god it's bang on what the article says. Low manganese, low selenium and low copper:
I know the selenium isn't that low however this samples from 2021 and I might have been supplementing with selenium back then.
I wonder what other people's htma's show on this forum?
I've never supplemented manganese or copper. Although my diet was pretty high in manganese I think last year.
My issue though with all this is whilst the statistical significance must be important. As far as I'm concerned htma's show binding levels - what your body is excreting. So doesn't this mean a few things a) it's holding onto the low ones b) it's simply not got a lot of them in the first place. But which is it?
So I decided to pull out my htma from 2018 to see how that compares which gives me a 4 year window:
These values aren't wildly different but the copper is higher. I guess my selenium intake is maybe better than some people's. Assuming in Ron's analysis these levels were simply much lower.
--
As an aside supplementing copper is very tricky. I decided not to bother and bought Thorne biomins instead (which does have zinc and copper and iron in it).
So I'm assuming this is newly published info.
Thought I'd check my htma from this year and my god it's bang on what the article says. Low manganese, low selenium and low copper:
I know the selenium isn't that low however this samples from 2021 and I might have been supplementing with selenium back then.
I wonder what other people's htma's show on this forum?
I've never supplemented manganese or copper. Although my diet was pretty high in manganese I think last year.
My issue though with all this is whilst the statistical significance must be important. As far as I'm concerned htma's show binding levels - what your body is excreting. So doesn't this mean a few things a) it's holding onto the low ones b) it's simply not got a lot of them in the first place. But which is it?
So I decided to pull out my htma from 2018 to see how that compares which gives me a 4 year window:
These values aren't wildly different but the copper is higher. I guess my selenium intake is maybe better than some people's. Assuming in Ron's analysis these levels were simply much lower.
--
As an aside supplementing copper is very tricky. I decided not to bother and bought Thorne biomins instead (which does have zinc and copper and iron in it).