MeSci
ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
- Messages
- 8,233
- Location
- Cornwall, UK
Such negative reactions as I have seen have been in a subset of patients for whom dysbiosis is a known issue. It's very clear from the the KDM study that it deals with a particular subset of ME patients as such it is 30% of a subset, not 30% of the general ME population.
What KDM study? AFAIK, a substantial proportion of us have dysbiosis.
The survey pointed to by Hip indicated that negative reactions to Ribose were no more prevalent than for CoQ10 with very few marked reactions.
I reacted badly to Co-Q10 too = hypo. Maybe that is because my blood glucose is well-controlled, so I clearly don't have an insulin problem, at least since being on my leaky-gut diet and supplements (don't know what it was like before). Many of us consider that the leaky-gut diet and supplements is the best way to fix dysbiosis, and I certainly have vastly better digestion since starting it, suggesting that I have fixed the dysbiosis. Gut flora are largely determined by diet. I don't know whether or how d-ribose could fix the gut or immune system, and my immune system doesn't seem to need boosting, as I almost never get colds or flu, like many of us here.
So far as the energy v. rest issue is concerned that is hellishly complex and more a coffee table debate than something to do in email. If you can't bear that in the short term (for me the fatigue was much worse - I decided to live with the discomfort) - I can see an argument for upward titration and morning weighting.
This is not email. It is a forum for discussing all issues to do with ME. Coffee-table??
I can bear a hell of a lot, but if an adverse effect is severe I take that as a warning.